Do you think formal written assessments in today's world to assess students’ performance is effective or not? Discuss your viewpoint on this and support your answer with examples.
Recently, the phenomenon of formal written assessments and its corresponding impcats have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and cosequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the oral assessments such as lecture can be a plus, and I will analyza that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, the academic assessments can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed and academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both the university assessment and accordingly complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, only one method in students’ performance assessment might increase the consequences of critical needs. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of written assessments and similar way to students’ assessment far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues’ potential implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-26 | sidved123@gmail.com | 77 | view |
| 2019-05-21 | andrefreitas | 61 | view |
| 2019-04-26 | AkashPTEnikalo | 77 | view |
| 2019-03-22 | Rajnikant Chauhan | 77 | view |
| 2019-02-14 | arami | 88 | view |
- The ability to learn more than one language will be less important in the future. Do you agree or disagree? 11
- Most people in what are known as the developed nations have homes full of gadgets and labor-saving devices, from vacuum cleaners and dishwashers to the latest in computer technology. Some people claim that despite all these labor-saving devices, we seem t 11
- Migration to cities are increasing and public transport must be developed.s. 77
- Age discrimination occurs when decision is made on person's age 88
- The ability to learn more than one language will be less important in future. Do you agree or disagree? 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 298, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...side of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it ...
^^
Line 4, column 180, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...similar way to students' assessment far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1462.0 1207.87684729 121% => OK
No of words: 250.0 242.827586207 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.848 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.37374332159 2.71678728327 124% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.656 0.580463131201 113% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 379.143842365 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9782998989 50.4703680194 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.909090909 104.977214359 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7272727273 20.9669160288 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.09090909091 7.25397266985 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227178050273 0.242375264174 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0772249053003 0.0925447433944 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0483700967712 0.071462118173 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128819371599 0.151781067708 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0285693349226 0.0609392437508 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 12.6369458128 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 23.77 53.1260098522 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.95 11.5310837438 147% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.04 8.32886699507 133% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 55.0591133005 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.