The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.
The pie chart illustrates the primary causes for land degradation all over the world; whereas the table shows the proportion of land afflicted by those reasons in three areas namely North America, Europe, and Oceania during the 1990s.
Overall, it is clear that land was degraded mostly by over-gazing. Additionally, Europe had the largest amount of land degraded between the three areas surveyed.
In terms of reasons for land degradation, over-grazing contributed 35%, followed by 30% of deforestation. The third motive was from over-cultivation, which accounted for 38%. Finally, only 7% of the land was destroyed by other factors.
Meanwhile, Europe had 23% of total land degraded in which nearly 10% of the figure was from deforestation. The proportion of land degradation in Oceania and North America was significantly low, just 13% and 5% respectively. However, overgrazing spoilt 11.3% of land in Oceania while over-cultivation destroyed the largest amount of land in North America, at 3.3%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-18 | huathibichngoc.c3.ltt@gmail.com | 61 | view |
- The table below shows the percentage of the population by age groups in one town who rode bicycles in 2011. 78
- The maps below shoe the center of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development 91
- The graph below shows different sources of air pollutants in the UK from 1990 to 2005. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- Topic: Leaders and directors in an organization are normally older people. Some people think younger leaders would be better. Do you agree or disagree? 84
- The main purpose of a public library is to provide books, and they shouldn’t waste the limited resources and space on providing expensive hi-tech media such as computer software, video, and DVDs.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statemen 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, so, third, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 855.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 156.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48076923077 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53411884305 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20371122524 2.65546596893 121% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576923076923 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 249.3 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.2765193213 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.0 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3333333333 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77777777778 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 1.13902439024 702% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170208337589 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0706775007565 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0907958482501 0.0843802449381 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124452090715 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114245039765 0.0819641961636 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.