Children should learn good handwriting, or typing at school, which one is more important?
Recently, the phenomenon of children should learn good handwriting, or typing at school and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures, is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that writing school homework can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, training of handwriting in school curriculum can provide the society with some noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment, which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both using pen and paper and accordingly words connection apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of the public arena, typing at school might increase the consequences of critical needs. Moreover, fundamental aspects of digital typing skills could relate to this reality that the demerits of automatic spelling pertain to grammar destruction. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notions of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of learning good handwriting skills far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues' potential implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-16 | shyamsingh08 | 85 | view |
| 2019-10-15 | mndpsngh21 | 82 | view |
| 2019-10-15 | mndpsngh21 | 72 | view |
| 2019-10-15 | mndpsngh21 | 72 | view |
| 2019-09-25 | sunilkms | 77 | view |
- If you want to study a particular area of climate change, which area/subject will you choose? 85
- Nowadays, people spend too much time at work to the extent that they hardly have time for their personal life. Discuss. 88
- Some sports are considered extremely dangerous, but many people still like them. Why do people take part in dangerous sports? Give some suggestions on how to deal with these dangers. 80
- Nowadays, people spend too much time at work to the extent that they hardly have time for their personal life. 88
- Do you think English will remain a global language despite globalization? Discuss your views with examples. 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1557.0 1207.87684729 129% => OK
No of words: 271.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.74538745387 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18946007987 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 139.433497537 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.686346863469 0.580463131201 118% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 379.143842365 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.992546748 50.4703680194 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.75 104.977214359 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5833333333 20.9669160288 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.25397266985 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208710303608 0.242375264174 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0660137520516 0.0925447433944 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107454326835 0.071462118173 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108294283613 0.151781067708 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0742919030712 0.0609392437508 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 12.6369458128 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.37 11.5310837438 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.08 8.32886699507 133% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 55.0591133005 198% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.