The table below shows the population of three cities in 1990, the population forecast of 2000 and the actual of 2000. summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparison where relevant.
The given table depicts the actual population among Sao Paulo, Jakarta, and Shanghai cities in 1990 and 2000. The data is calibrated in million.
The most striking feature to be observed is that Sao Paulo city contain more population between 1990 and 2000.
It can be vividly seen that, in 1990, Sao Paulo led with highest 15 million whereas Shanghai, Jakarta occupied second and third position with 13.5 and 9.5 million. It was predicted that in 2000, the population of Sao Paulo city would increased significantly and reach 24 million.
Turning to rest of description, the actual population of Sao Paulo in 2000 was 18 million which was 6 million lesser than the prediction. The population of Shanghai was expected to increase and become 17 million. Surprisingly, it was decreased and by the end of decade it was 12.5 million. The population of jakarta was expected to rise 4.5 but it elevated sharply with 17.5 million in 2000. As far as comparison is concerned, the population of Jakarta was decreased in 2000 while other two cities population upsurged noticeably.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-04-25 | yashu_5219 | 56 | view |
- In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on construction new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. others believe that money should be spent on improving public transport. discuss both views and 67
- Nowadays the importance of teachers is diminishing due to increased availability of alternative resources to students, to what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement. 56
- Some people believe that physical fitness of strong individual or team is the reason for most sport achievements. Others think that mental attitude is more important. Discuss both the view points and give your own opinion. 78
- the bar chart below show the participation of children in selected leisure activities. 78
- the diagram below show the current ground floor plan of a museum and the proposed changes to its layout summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparison where relevant 82
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 137, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...990 and 2000. The data is calibrated in million. The most striking feature to be ob...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... The data is calibrated in million. The most striking feature to be observed is...
^^^
Line 5, column 235, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'increase'
Suggestion: increase
... the population of Sao Paulo city would increased significantly and reach 24 million. ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 90, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tion of Sao Paulo in 2000 was 18 million which was 6 million lesser than the pred...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, so, third, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 899.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02234636872 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73773798292 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.536312849162 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 259.2 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.3158604596 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.9 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.2 5.23603664747 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241671889764 0.215688989381 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127037975388 0.103423049105 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0980437078273 0.0843802449381 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189842494109 0.15604864568 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0588825285458 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.54 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.