In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
It is believed that in some nations a lot of money should be spent on building new railway lines for high-speed trains between cities. However, others claim that the money ought to be spent on developing present public transport. This essay will examine both sides of the argument.
On the one hand, new railway lines are beneficial for citizens. High-speed trains are one of the safety and faster types of public transports. Safety travelling is very important and by using this type of train, individuals can commute between cities very fast. Nowadays people try live far from the city centre and they are commuting to work by fast trains every other day. Moreover, it is also convenient for citizens who live and work in different cities. Furthermore, having fast trains can reduce cars on the roads, because people will travel by train being speedy.
On the other hand, speedy trains and roads for them are very costly. The money that is spending for them could be used for motorway reparation and these roads can be used for cars, busses and motorcycles. Another possibility would be to use this money for regular commuter trains and busses for public, because they are more affordable for most population. Moreover, other types of transport such as boats and ferries can be improved by using this budget.
In conclusion, improvement in transport system is important for country, because citizens can travel safely and fast. It is thought that taxes, which are paid by individuals, should be spent on the type of transport, which will have the most benefit to all citizens. Therefore, I believe that country ought to concentrate on high-speed railways, which is safety in order to care about people and future generation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-20 | MinyiChu | 67 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 61 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 61 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 67 | view |
| 2023-12-30 | Tường Vân | 73 | view |
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.Why is this case? What can be done about this problem? 56
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry. Why is this the case? What can be done about this problem? 67
- the graph below shows changes in the distribution of average household income between 1965 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 85
- the bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. 73
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1444.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99653979239 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54621911117 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.519031141869 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 441.0 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.8737347919 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.25 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0625 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.125 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.378102804113 0.244688304435 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127933577129 0.084324248473 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0847477102868 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.244790232108 0.151304729494 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102465073499 0.056905535591 180% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.