Children brought up in families with less money are better prepared for life than those from wealthy families.
Who are better prepared to face the life - adults who were raised lavishly or in a destitute condition? To a certain extent, I would agree that children who were raised in a low-income family are better in facing life than those who came from a rich family. However, I also believe that it really depends on how parents teach their children.
For a number of reasons, many experts believe that children who are brought up in the middle and low-income families are better prepared in facing life, as life is not always easy. Firstly, these children are accustomed living a simple lifestyle. Instead of having their own room, with all the toys and comfortable beds in the room, they have to sleep with their siblings in a small room. They learn how to share, take care of others, manage the budgets and most importantly become contented with whatever they have. As these children do not have many luxuries in life, they would easily adapt to the harsh conditions. Secondly, these children are already taught to be independent at an early age. Many of their parents could not afford to pay school tuition fees, therefore they have to have a part-time job to pay the school fees. They appreciate more about education as they have to pay by their own and thus learn to be independent at an early age.
These experts also believe that children who are raised in rich families will face difficulties when they grow up and face the real world. One of the reasons is that their parents have always provided them with all the materials they wanted and needed. They have fancy clothes, expensive toys and advanced gadgets in their hands without having to work hard. As they rely heavily on the parent's wealth, they will face problems if there is a financial crisis. However, not all wealthy parents spoil their children, and in many instances, rich children get better facilities to settle in life.
To conclude, the upbringing of a child mostly defines who he will become in the future. Family wealth, though important from some angels, is not always the determining fact for someone's personality and adaptability as better parenting is more crucial.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-28 | uyen9595 | 56 | view |
| 2019-03-28 | uyen9595 | 56 | view |
| 2019-03-09 | Saira Faiz | 73 | view |
| 2019-03-09 | Saira Faiz | 61 | view |
| 2019-03-09 | Saira Faiz | 67 | view |
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages 87
- write a letter to an organizer about the hotel you stayed who booked the hotel for youmeeting detailsWhat you did not like about the hotelwhat you want organizer to do 56
- write a letter to an organizer about the hotel you stayed who booked the hotel for youmeeting detailsWhat you did not like about the hotelwhat you want organizer to do 78
- Most employers do job interviews before offering a position to a person. Do you think this is the best way to do it, or are there better alternatives? What is the best method of choosing employees in your opinion? 78
- Nowadays on-line shopping has become more popular than in-store shopping. Is it a positive or a negative development? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...arn to be independent at an early age. These experts also believe that children...
^^^
Line 5, column 387, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'parents'' or 'parent's'?
Suggestion: parents'; parent's
... work hard. As they rely heavily on the parents wealth, they will face problems if ther...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, really, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1782.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 369.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82926829268 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44387100283 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.49864498645 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 558.0 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.0435897314 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.44444444444 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227047234857 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0763551689884 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0852307291745 0.0667982634062 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144234568325 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0403617346839 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.