The graph below gives information about car ownership in Britain from 1971 to 2007.
The line graph illustrates the changes in the number of cars per household in Britain between 1971 and 2007.
Overall, car ownership in Britain increased over the period shown. Also, the proportion of households with two cars rose while the opposite is true for those without a car.
In 1971, nearly half of all British households did not have regular use of a car. Around 44% owned one car, but the figure for households with two cars was well below 10%. It was uncommon for British families at that time to have three or more cars, with only about 2% of families falling into this category.
Over the period of 36 years, the percentage of households having one car remained stable. In contrast, the proportion of families who own no car and two cars experienced a significant downward and upward trend respectively. By 2007, these figures were nearly the same at approximately 25%. There was a gradual increase in the proportion of households with three cars or more, which reached around 7% at the end of the given time frame.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-08 | ali1902 | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-08 | ali1902 | 67 | view |
| 2019-10-12 | dglore | 84 | view |
| 2019-04-02 | Nguyễn Đỗ Phước | 73 | view |
| 2019-04-02 | Nguyễn Đỗ Phước | 73 | view |
- New technologies have changed the way children spend their free time. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 78
- Some people do not go directly to college but travel or work for a short time. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 67
- Some people say television contributes more than other modern inventions to the quality of life of ordinary people Do you agree or disagree 89
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and large companies can make a difference. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- In some countries schools are teaching foreign languages to primary school children Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, well, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 863.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79444444444 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57487264458 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616666666667 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 259.2 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.3021977137 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.3 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.3 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236198092454 0.215688989381 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103920231992 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0744046968744 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171717156814 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.067758506475 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.