Poor lifestyles have a negative impact on people’s health. List some unhealthy lifestyles and discuss what government services could help?
Today, it is impossible to deny the fact that poor lifestyles have a negative impact on people’s health, however, whether government should invest funds to provide services to improve people’s health was sparked a heated debate. Although, contested by some that people are responsible for their poor lifestyles, such issue is regarded thoroughly both positive and constructive by a number of individuals. In my opinion, lack of exercises, irregular sleep pattern and overtime work are the major reasons impact people’s health, and I will elaborate in the following essay.
To begin with, irregular sleep pattern is one of the most obvious problems which majority of students and workers are facing today, and will lead to a series of health problems, such as increase in the risk of cardiovascular diseases, psychological problems and shortened life expectancy. For instance, a research conducted by University of New South Wales on final undergraduate students explored that 62% had suffered from some sort of anxiety and constant tiredness contributed from late night sleep. Hence, government should step in and encourage students to have eight to ten hours of sleep every night.
Furthermore, lack of exercises and overtime work had both lead to impaired eyesight and overweight, which can cause long term health issues. Since majority of works required use of computers and indoor meetings, researchers had found an increased trend of short eyesight among young professionals and students. Therefore, poor work cycle and lack of exercise need to be corrected by government introducing laws on the minimum wedge and the maximum working hours, as well as building sports facilities.
In conclusion, poor lifestyles contribute to increase risk of getting sick physically and mentally. Government shall create laws to enhance people’s health and facilities which encourage a healthy lifestyle.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-27 | joyspacechou0130 | 77 | view |
- The experience of work is more important than having a qualification Do you agree or disagree 92
- Technology allows us to have a helpful and interesting life than in the past Do you agree or disagree 94
- Happiness index is becoming a new national success rather than only economic growth. What do you think about this idea? What can be used to measure happiness index? 80
- Parents should be held legally responsible for their children’s acts. What is your opinion? Support it with personal examples. 77
- Some people think law changes human behavior. Do you agree or disagree? 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, therefore, well, for instance, in conclusion, sort of, such as, as well as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 8.36945812808 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 20.9802955665 33% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 31.9359605911 135% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1630.0 1207.87684729 135% => OK
No of words: 293.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56313993174 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04522554859 2.71678728327 112% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 139.433497537 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610921501706 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 379.143842365 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.9952772507 50.4703680194 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.181818182 104.977214359 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6363636364 20.9669160288 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.2727272727 7.25397266985 183% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 2.75862068966 254% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259840979763 0.242375264174 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0946056361331 0.0925447433944 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102912926656 0.071462118173 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161384260701 0.151781067708 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.127481379007 0.0609392437508 209% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 12.6369458128 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 53.1260098522 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 11.5310837438 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.78 8.32886699507 117% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 55.0591133005 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.