Nowadays morw tasks at home and work are being performed by robots. Why do you think it is happening? Is it a negative or positive development.
It is incontrovertible fact that today, human are totally dependent on the technology and they do not imagine there glass without it. The people are mostly prefer robots for their house and office related work. This essay examines the causes behind it and argue that it is overall negative development for the masses and society.
To embark with, there are many reason why people are use robots. Firstly, people are not capable to do any work because, they cannot do any work continuously and for a long time. But, the robots can do work for very often and perfect as compared to humans. As well as, people life have risk in some works like in Tunnels and handling the heavy loads. So, at that time reports are perfect. Moreover, in this fast paced era, the robot will do all household then, people can get time for their family or themself.
No doubt, it has a positive development for everyone because, it makes people life convenient and faster. However, it has some negative consequences in the life of people. If people will totally dependent on robots for their all works, it can lead unemployment. In addition to this, it can affect the person's health like people can become lethargic due to his technical gadgets because they will have no any work for doing.
In conclusion, nowadays everyone is use technical equipment in their works like mobile phones, washing machines and so on. Also, it has plethora of benefits to the people but, it can lead major consequences in the future time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-02 | Bhimani Nikunj | 61 | view |
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of british people giving money to charity by age range foe years 1990 and 2010. 56
- People have different job expectations for jobs some people prefer to do the same job for the same company whereas others prefer to change jobs frequently asked questions about the advantages and disadvantages of each viewpoint. 56
- The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country. 78
- Some people believe that playing a musical instrument can be beneficial in many different ways. Others think it is a waste of time to play a musical instrument. Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
- Some people believe that playing a musical instrument can be beneficial in many different ways. Others think it is a waste of time to play a musical instrument. Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 157, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'preferred'.
Suggestion: preferred
...glass without it. The people are mostly prefer robots for their house and office relat...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 302, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
... In addition to this, it can affect the persons health like people can become lethargic...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 402, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...echnical gadgets because they will have no any work for doing. In conclusion, n...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, then, well, in addition, in conclusion, no doubt, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1244.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78461538462 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48241150173 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 402.3 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.5414836284 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.9333333333 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3333333333 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122554599805 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0474670500288 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0316345928356 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0745463270692 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0378561725073 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.0946893788 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 12.4159519038 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.