Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear.
Government is a body that governs the rules and regulations of a state in the interest of the people. It sets some targets for the common well-being of all the citizens and tries to bring the less privileged at par with others. Our history reflects that there are plenty of discoveries from the scientist who were not looking for the one they discovered. The research held to discover something resulted in something more wonderful. Hence government should fund any scientific research even when consequences are unclear.
Microwave is an accidental discovery, Percy Spencer, was known as electronics genius. While he was working on radar related project, he was testing a new vacuum tube, he discovered that a chocolate bar he had in his pocket melted more quickly than he would have expected. He became intrigued and started experimenting by aiming the tube at other items: eggs, popcorn etc. This led to the discovery of Microwave, which has become very important in our day to day lives. The other amazing discovery which is considered as the boon to medical field is X-ray. German physicist was working on cathode ray tube. One day despite the fact that the tube was covered, he noticed that the nearby fluorescent screen would glow when the tube was on and the room was dark. He tried keeping many objects to test: box, books, wood piece etc. when he kept his hand in front of the tube he could see his bones on the screen. This is how X-ray was discovered.
Furthermore, technology has revolutionized the world, surely there has been no time in history where the lives of people have changed more dramatically. There is no day in which we don’t use technology. Computer that processes information on silicon bridges that are 0.09 microns wide, has become the vital part of this generation. If the scientist who discovered the computer, sat with fear of failing then I wouldn’t be sitting here in front of the computer to write this.
Even though the scientist will not condone that their discovery is by accident all the time but there are cases even the accidental discoveries turned out be the amazing ones. Funding to any such researches will help the nation in one or the other way. It is only through research that we can make progress. All the researches held by scientist will not bring success, there will be failures, there will be losses, there will be consequences, but fear of losing should not stop anyone neither the government nor the scientists.
Known is a drop; unknown is an ocean. To sum it all, I will not agree with the author’s claim that government should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear. Certainly, there are many medical, agricultural and space research led to one another and resulted in great discoveries.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-23 | Himanshu Sharma | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | jason123 | 75 | view |
| 2019-12-06 | pooja.kakde@gmail.com | 58 | view |
| 2019-12-06 | pooja.kakde@gmail.com | 16 | view |
| 2019-11-24 | skjasharif | 50 | view |
- Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear. 50
- Some people believe that society should try to save every plant and animal species, despite the expense to humans in effort, time, and financial well-being. Others believe that society need not make extraordinary efforts, especially at a great cost in mon 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 434, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...g resulted in something more wonderful. Hence government should fund any scientific r...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, hence, if, look, so, then, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 32.0 19.5258426966 164% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.3162921348 177% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2328.0 2235.4752809 104% => OK
No of words: 474.0 442.535393258 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91139240506 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66599839874 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73838362164 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 250.0 215.323595506 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527426160338 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 719.1 704.065955056 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.8187364507 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.5384615385 118.986275619 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2307692308 23.4991977007 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.15384615385 5.21951772744 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232656238159 0.243740707755 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0713433304471 0.0831039109588 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.170978275787 0.0758088955206 226% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176521996967 0.150359130593 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.173158147247 0.0667264976115 260% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.8420337079 126% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 100.480337079 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.