Some people think that all children should learn geography in school. However, some others think that it is more important to learn subjects that are more relevant to life. What is your opinion?
With an unprecedented development in the realms of science and technology, there is now an increasing debate if geography is out-of-date in today’s time and have little relevance and therefore should be removed. Others, still believe that geography is an ever-green and core subject which fosters a child general knowledge, and thus is indispensable and schools must continue teaching it. In my opinion, although, updating school curriculum to match with fast paced technological development is good, however, subjects such as geography and arts imparts students with mandatory general knowledge and should be mandatory part of curriculum.
Geography, firstly, is the only subject that deals with the physical and geometric aspects of our universe. Knowledge of which, I believe, is absolutely a must. We cannot imagine our future generation of educated people having no idea about the basic facts of our planet. Climatic knowledge gained by studying geography, secondly, is also necessary for a student to have, especially, during current times where the global environmental deterioration as a result of drastic climate change is on rise. Therefore, we and our future generation will not be able to tackle this spiny problem, if we are not taught about it at the first place. Basic facts about the countries and their locations, finally, is also required, as many corporates and businesses look for candidates having sound general knowledge on various fields of life.
On the other hand, few people argue that studying geography does not add any value to a child’s future and consider it to be obsolete. They believe that we must concentrate on much more important subjects such as science and technology. Those people, as per me are short-sighted and they see only the immediate benefits of a child’s education. Studying technology is definitely beneficial and there is no denying this fact. However, other subjects too have their own benefits which may not be evidently perceivable, but have a long-term benefit to a student and a society at large.
From the above argument, it can be concluded that current students are our future generation and they must have a fine blend of knowledge from various fields, including traditional subjects like geography and history, as well as, today’s relevant one’s such as science and technology.
- In many countries the tradition of families having meals together is disappearing. Why is this happen? What will be the effects of it to the family and to the society? 84
- In modern society, many people think primary schools should teach science and technology rather than history and geography, which are useless and boring.Do you agree or disagree with this statement? 84
- Some people think that secondary school children should study international news as one of the school subjects Other people think that it is a waste of valuable school time What do you think Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples f 92
- You recently received a letter from a friend asking for advice about whether to go to college or try to get a job. You think he/she should get a job. 89
- Improvements in health, education and trade are essential for the development of poorer nations. However, the governments of richer nations should take more responsibility for helping the poorer nations in such areas.To what extent do you agree or disagre 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 459, Rule ID: TOO_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to have'?
Suggestion: to have
...ying this fact. However, other subjects too have their own benefits which may not be evi...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, thus, well, such as, as a result, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 10.4138276553 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2002.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 373.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3672922252 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39467950092 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00332241329 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55764075067 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 632.7 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.9017450452 49.4020404114 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.466666667 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8666666667 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.8666666667 7.06120827912 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118539738708 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0388381840687 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0372339547404 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0730353649409 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0399629171496 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.