Learning about the past has no value for those of us living in the present. Do you agree or disagree? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Different people have different views on a statement. Learning about the past has no value for those who of us living in the present. I do not agree with this statement. Past activities has greater impact on the acts of present and if someone does not take account the past then s/he will prone to failure. In the following few paragraphs, I will put forward my opinions regarding the above statement.
History is a precious asset to every nation. Every nation should preserve it's history so that the future generations can take lesson from that. Almost all the developed country's of today has it's rich history and these country's has reached to zenith by taking lessons from their past. Today's world is dominated by United States of America (USA), it has a long and proud history. The government also patronizes to preserve this precious history and all the citizen have greater respect to their history and that might be the reason why USA is ruling the world now.
Every people should learn their history. It has pervasive impact in every sphere of our life. Suppose, we can take idea from the parents of a successful man ; how his/her parents groomed his/her to reach to the peak of the career, they can have their experience. From this experience, the parents of today can have an idea how to build the career of their children.
I am a citizen of Bangladesh and like many country we have also a long history. We achieved our independence as a result of long struggling for 9 months and at the expense of lives of thirty hundred thousand people. Each and every citizen should know this history because it can raise the patriotism in them and only then we can develop as a nation. That's why learning about past is of great importance to present.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-12 | Pandalove | 70 | view |
| 2019-12-27 | Majid1369708090 | 76 | view |
| 2019-10-22 | swapnil.paliwal | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-26 | S_Daftari | 80 | view |
| 2019-04-24 | Shazli | 83 | view |
- During the past year, workers at our newly opened factory reported 30 percent more on-the-job accidents than workers at nearby Panoply Industries. Panoply produces products very similar to those produced at our factory, but its work shifts are one hour sh 49
- Some people believe that the Earth is being harmed (damaged) by human activity. Others feel that human activity makes the Earth a better place to live. What is your opinion? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- When you face difficult problems in life what do you feel is the best way to solve them asking someone with more experience for advice about the problem finding information about the problem using the Internet taking a long time to think about the problem 90
- Learning about the past has no value for those of us living in the present. Do you agree or disagree? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- Altruism of human and animals 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 366, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to build the career of their children. I am a citizen of Bangladesh and like ma...
^^^
Line 4, column 351, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...d only then we can develop as a nation. Thats why learning about past is of great imp...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, regarding, so, then, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 15.1003584229 33% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1442.0 1977.66487455 73% => OK
No of words: 309.0 407.700716846 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66666666667 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44460798915 2.67179642975 91% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 212.727598566 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53074433657 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 454.5 618.680645161 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.6423455028 48.9658058833 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.1111111111 100.406767564 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1666666667 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.33333333333 5.45110844103 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142382371819 0.236089414692 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0586881778803 0.076458572812 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121114460315 0.0737576698707 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0965464743852 0.150856017488 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100368330679 0.0645574589148 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 11.7677419355 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.51 10.9000537634 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.34 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 86.8835125448 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.002688172 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.