Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end hunger and poverty, while others say that economic growth is damaging the environment so it must be stopped. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In contemporary society, the economy is high on the agenda, for the governments. Some people contend that the unique method to delete famine and poverty is economic development, whereas others think that this way results in bad effects of the environment. In my viewpoint, I agree with both ideas owing to these reasons.
On the one hand, the tragedy of hunger and poverty will be erased but for economic growth. The first reason is that people have more opportunities for the job because many entrepreneurs are built. They can pay for bills, improve their standard life with their salaries, therefore It is not the existence of famine. Moreover, when the economy of a country improves significantly, the government may gain much profit which is subsidies for hard-up families. As an example, they support a cow for each household in order to trade.
On the other hand, economic growth leads to environmental degradation. Firstly, while the bid factories are constructed, investors must cut down on trees, which is the cause of global warming. To illustrate, the winter is shorter than before, just as the sea levels rise. In addition to that, the amount of toxic emissions discharged by companies pollutes the air, hence, more people have had some diseases about lung. In recent research, people died by lung cancer accounted for the highest rate in 2018, and they anticipate that the figure will continue to increase sharply in 2019.
To conclude, economic advancement is necessary for inhabitants for these reasons, but the government need to take action on protecting the environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-22 | kieuoanh.dau | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-21 | kieuoanh.dau | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-21 | kieuoanh.dau | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-05 | Mai Thu Minh | 84 | view |
| 2019-06-14 | codefree | 67 | view |
- The graph shows the information about international conferences in three capital cities in 1980-2010. 78
- The charts below show the percentage of water used by different sectors in Sydney, Australia, in 1997 and 2007. 67
- The table shows the amount of money donated in aid of technology of developing countries by charities in the US, EU and other countries from 2006 to 2010. 67
- When designing a building, the most important factor is intended use of the building rather than its outward appearance. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- In the modern world It is possible to shop, work and communicate with people via the internet and live without any face-to-face contact with others. Is this a positive or negative development? 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, whereas, while, in addition, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 1.00243902439 599% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 16.0 5.60731707317 285% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1334.0 965.302439024 138% => OK
No of words: 260.0 196.424390244 132% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13076923077 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81711800359 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 106.607317073 158% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.646153846154 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 418.5 283.868780488 147% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.5287138944 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.2857142857 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5714285714 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.57142857143 5.23603664747 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153373098483 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0532928703782 0.103423049105 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0680956014863 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0886098348565 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0318636915057 0.0819641961636 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 40.7170731707 184% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.