The carts below show the percentage of monthly household income spent on various items by two different groups in one European country.
The two pie charts illustrate how much money people from different income groups spend from monthly household income on different products and services in one European country.
Overall, it can be seen that people with low income spend more than half on fuel bills, food and drink while people with high income spend more money on miscellaneous and recreation culture.
People with low income spend on fuel bills and for food and drinks more than half of their monthly income while people with high income spend on it 7% and 15% respectively. 18% of monthly income people with low income spend on Miscellaneous and people with high income spend on it by 5% more. People with high income spend on recreation culture 21% and people with low income spend by 10% less.
12% of income people with high income spend on transport while people with low income spend on it 3 times less. For transport people with low income and high income spend 9% and 16% respectively and for clothing they both spend approximately the same amount of money.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-22 | Delime | 78 | view |
| 2022-02-05 | Awadhesh Mourya | 84 | view |
| 2021-09-21 | sonicmaster | 78 | view |
| 2020-09-07 | longpm2k | 42 | view |
| 2020-04-03 | Jocelyn | 78 | view |
- The graph and bar chart below show the average monthly rainfall and temperature for one region of East Africa. 56
- The government is spending a lot of money to discover life on other planets. Some people think that government is wasting money and should spend more money addressing the problems of public. 73
- The graph below shows four countries of residence of overseas students in Australia. 67
- Some people think that dangerous sports should be banned, while others think people should be free to choose.Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
- Many things that used to be done in the home by hands are now being done by machines.Does this development bring more advantages or disadvantages? 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 860.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80446927374 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33107545979 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 74.0 106.607317073 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.413407821229 0.547539520022 76% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.8881840949 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.857142857 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5714285714 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.28571428571 5.23603664747 25% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149692863952 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112714428328 0.103423049105 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100434450065 0.0843802449381 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141650722616 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123203730169 0.0819641961636 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.64 8.06136585366 82% => OK
difficult_words: 20.0 40.7170731707 49% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.