It is widely accepted that technological equipment are imperative in today classrooms. Some people assert as computers are being used more and more in education there will be soon no role for teachers in class. Agree or disagree?
Education has always remained an important part of our society. With the proliferation of technology, there have been vast changes in the education system and technological equipment have become imperative in today’s classroom. Some people opine that if this trend continued soon computers will replace teachers in class. I strongly disagree with this latter notion. This essay will elaborate on my viewpoints and hence lead to a reasoned conclusion.
There is a myriad of arguments in favor of my stance. The most preponderant one is that, although technology is playing a major role in education, it cannot replace the need of a tutor. Computers can only provide the material to students, but the help in making them understand it. For example, every child has a different level of learning ability and need different strategies as well as time to grasp the given information. Nevertheless, to say only a teacher can pay attention to these things which are crucial for the academic development of students.
Another pivotal aspect for upholding this notion is that these technological equipment are made by humans, which means they cannot be spontaneous. As a result, they will only deliver information which is fed in them, despite the current trend. Not only, teaching requires skills to make a point delivered clearly, but also understanding the power to know the intelligence level of children. In addition, a malfunction can occur at any time in these types of equipment, which can affect the students. Hence is quite clear that the presence of a mentor in a classroom is indispensable.
In view of the arguments outlined above, it can be concluded the role of a teacher is of great importance in the education system, as the future of students on it. Therefore practically it is not possible that computers will ever replace them in the classroom.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-22 | namdev190@gmail.com | 80 | view |
- More information available online so library’s books are useless or as e-books are available online these days, the value of printed books has diminished. Agree or Disagree? 80
- Education is not a luxury, but a basic human right and as such should be free for everyone, irrespective of personal wealth. To what extent do you agree or disagree 80
- The importance of cars and aeroplane in modern life. Give examples. 55
- Whether design of building will have a positive or negative impact on people’s life and work? 55
- Q- Some people think law changes our behavior? Discuss. 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 500, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...uipment, which can affect the students. Hence is quite clear that the presence of a m...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 164, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ystem, as the future of students on it. Therefore practically it is not possible that com...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, for example, in addition, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 6.10837438424 213% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 20.9802955665 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 31.9359605911 132% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 5.75862068966 295% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1560.0 1207.87684729 129% => OK
No of words: 306.0 242.827586207 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09803921569 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 3.92707691288 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00349377205 2.71678728327 111% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 139.433497537 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581699346405 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 379.143842365 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 12.6551724138 134% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.6666456957 50.4703680194 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.7647058824 104.977214359 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.9669160288 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.23529411765 7.25397266985 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 2.91625615764 274% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208193597712 0.242375264174 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0564165079963 0.0925447433944 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.060871135682 0.071462118173 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123146608751 0.151781067708 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0580915019948 0.0609392437508 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 12.6369458128 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.1260098522 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 11.5310837438 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.32886699507 108% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 55.0591133005 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.94827586207 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.