In underdeveloped countries, tourism has disadvantages and can be said the opposite as well.
With augmentation of globalization tourism industry has gained immense popularity in under developed countries. It has become the source of income for the native Peoples of these countries, as a result, increasing their economy. On the other hand, some people opine that it has more disadvantages that the benefits. My opinion, however, coincides with the former notion. This essay will elaborate on viewpoints and hence lead to a reasoned conclusion.
There is myriad of arguments in favor of my stance. The most preponderant one is that, increasing tourism has given colossal job opportunities to the people of under developed countries. In addition, it has caused the development of those areas. For example, better roads and infrastructure are constructed by the government to attract tourist. Hence, it has made the life of people easier than before.
Another key justification to uphold the argument is that, it has helped to spread the customs and tradition of a particular region to different parts of the world. Not only it provides opportunity to earn money, but also give chance to show their culture to the world. As an illustration, people attract tourists by showing them their traditional clothes or other monuments for which that particular area is famous for. Nevertheless, it is clear that tourism is proving beneficial to the people of less developed countries.
In view of arguments outlined above, it can be concluded that tourism can usher more income for the country’s economy, if it is given careful consideration.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, nevertheless, so, for example, in addition, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 20.9802955665 119% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1304.0 1207.87684729 108% => OK
No of words: 247.0 242.827586207 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27935222672 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07326652538 2.71678728327 113% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 139.433497537 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599190283401 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 414.0 379.143842365 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.6157635468 173% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.5024630542 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.9079335043 50.4703680194 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.9333333333 104.977214359 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4666666667 20.9669160288 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.25397266985 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143281571581 0.242375264174 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.041798136108 0.0925447433944 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0572945368189 0.071462118173 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0941294512381 0.151781067708 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0514230919327 0.0609392437508 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 12.6369458128 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 53.1260098522 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 11.5310837438 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.32886699507 110% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 55.0591133005 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.94827586207 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.3980295567 81% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 68.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.