Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people.
Why is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places?
Holidaymakers are mainly visiting numerous museums and historical sites rather than local people. In accordance with this statement, this essay will explain further information about contributing factor of the issue and also put forward the remedial measures in the following paragraphs.
In regard to the issue, I strongly believe that there are several reasons of why those tourist attractions mainly being visited by tourists. First and foremost, I think that local society has already visited those places for numerous time, thus, I believe that they are not fascinated to visit those places anymore. Second but not less crucial, it is caused by the lack of innovation of those places, therefore, it made individuals feeling dull to come there. Last but not least, another causative factor is caused by the minimum accommodation that these places had.
In accordance with the counter measures of how to attract more local individuals to these places. The government, firstly, has to create an innovation of improving these tourist destinations in order to make it having an interesting spot to be visited. The bureaucrat, secondly, also has to make a regular event on those places, particularly for organizing an appealing event such as culture competition or music festival. Lastly, the authority has to improve all facilities of these tourist destinations in order to assist all individuals more enjoying their time while they visited this place.
By way of conclusion, it seems to me that all tourist destinations, including museums and historical buildings, have to be monitored gradually by the authority. Thereby, in order to make all those positive efforts can be done, all people have to support the bureaucrat to maintain those tourist attractions properly.
- Intelligent machines such as robots are widely applied to take the place of human beings. Please, discuss the advantages and disadvantages. 11
- Bar chart : the percentage of boys, girls and all for chatting on the internet and playing on games console. 78
- Bar Chart : Employment rates, by country, 1995 – 2005. 78
- Academic staff percentages in faculties by gender 2012 72
- Recycling rate for selected materials :1982 - 2010 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, lastly, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, as to, i think, such as, in regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1501.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37992831541 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90983362363 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573476702509 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.7554850219 49.4020404114 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.083333333 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.83333333333 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.365646873898 0.244688304435 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127905727742 0.084324248473 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100151015873 0.0667982634062 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199708100849 0.151304729494 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0294642138271 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.