TPO£Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
Human is a sociable person and needs to interact with his other counterparts. This characteristic helps him to make a friend. Definitely, some people if were asked would agree with the statement that we should keep our old friend instead of making new friends while others have a negative attitude. As I am concerned, I completely agree with this opinion. In the following paragraph, I will shed light on arguments to support my view.
The first point to be mentioned is that understanding people’s personality takes a long time. If you want to make a new friend you have to waste a lot of time and energy and a new person might not be a real friend. While old friend is who that you are familiar with almost all of her features and definitely, you are the same in the way of thinking and interests. Hence, maintaining your relationship with an old friend is really worthwhile. For example, I have a friend that we have been a close friend since high school. We are very similar together, we attract to the same things, we like the same sports, we share our sadness and happiness together and help each other in any condition and I never want to lose her for any price.
The second reason that deserves some words is those old friends are reliable persons. You know each other for a long time and a mutual trust has formed between you. Therefore, every time, one has problems she can depend on her friend because she is sure her old friend help her without judging or gossiping about her. In contrast, if you share your problem with a new friend, she might not keep your secret and problem and create a lot of trouble for you. Back to the previous example, every time I confront an unforeseen situation and need urgent help my friend gives me some useful and practical pieces of advice that are often time beneficial. Also, I trust her with my secret. During the 12 years period of our friendship, she approves me her reliability and trustworthy.
By the way of conclusion, base on the argument above, I am of the opinion that we have to try to keep our relationship with our old friend rather than making new friends because understanding people’s personality and features take a long time and we might not find our interesting friend, also, old friends are reliable persons and we can trust them in any condition.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-18 | m_elec | 60 | view |
| 2019-11-26 | JohnSmith96 | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-05 | Navis | 70 | view |
| 2019-10-23 | swapnil.paliwal | 66 | view |
| 2019-10-23 | swapnil.paliwal | 66 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Computers vs. traditional school 76
- TPO22 Integrated question 73
- TPO6 Q1Integrated TOEFL writing 3
- tpo 35Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Famous entertainers and athletes deserve to have more privacy than they have now. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd we can trust them in any condition.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, if, really, second, so, therefore, while, as for, for example, in contrast, you know, by the way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 64.0 43.0788530466 149% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1918.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 415.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62168674699 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51348521516 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66064472228 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.484337349398 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 594.9 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 75.9084227386 48.9658058833 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.947368421 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8421052632 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.10526315789 5.45110844103 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261261127311 0.236089414692 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0894832503558 0.076458572812 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0708464841956 0.0737576698707 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174249492369 0.150856017488 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0300344764399 0.0645574589148 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 11.7677419355 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 10.9000537634 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 86.8835125448 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.