TPO 28
The reading and the listening materials have a debate on reaching Robert E. Peary to the North Pole. The writer puts forward 3 main hypotheses, which are refuted by following speaker.
Firstly, the writer suggests that Natural Geographic Society's committee confirmed Peary's success, while the speaker views this issue from an opposite angle. According to her this group were Peary's friends and did not study his records carefully. As a result, this claim are not valuable.
The second preposition have offered by the writer is that Tom Avery made the same expedition in less than 37 days, which proofs Peary's work. However, the speaker casts doubt on this point by saying that their conditions were not similar such as some tools and food which airplane transported in this exploration for Avery; Then, Avery could not do this mission in less than 37 days with that items. In Practical, it was not possible such speed with those kind of tools.
Lastly, the writer suggests that the photographs taken by Peary's camera support his expedition. On the contrary, the speaker holds an opposite view. The professor explains that these photos are for 100 years ago, and in that time, the quality of Peary's camera was not so high that we can rely on it for determining the shadows long. Indeed, the shadows are blur in many edges.
- TPO 40Question: Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how the proposal discussed in the lecture would solve the specific challenges described in the reading passage. 83
- TPO 33 80
- TPO 15Question: Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific solutions presented the reading passage.To stop spread of cane toad in Australia 85
- Some parents offer their school-age children money for each high grade (mark) they get in school. Do you think this is a good idea?Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- tpo 35 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 450, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'those kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; those kinds
...al, it was not possible such speed with those kind of tools. Lastly, the writer suggest...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 378, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed, the shadows are blur in many edges.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, lastly, second, so, then, while, kind of, such as, as a result, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1106.0 1373.03311258 81% => OK
No of words: 225.0 270.72406181 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91555555556 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38022304173 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 145.348785872 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626666666667 0.540411800872 116% => OK
syllable_count: 327.6 419.366225166 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 63.9105328801 49.2860985944 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.0769230769 110.228320801 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3076923077 21.698381199 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06452816374 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.328854424727 0.272083759551 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118851549195 0.0996497079465 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.12195443848 0.0662205650399 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185056504663 0.162205337803 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0375508309848 0.0443174109184 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.3589403974 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.96 12.2367328918 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.