the pie charts and table give information about the total value of fish imported to the us between 1988 and 2000.
The table and the pie charts illustrate the amount value of fish imported to the USA from 1998 through to 2000. At the first glance, it is evident that there was a significant upsurge for the total value because of fish imported in the entire years, and overall, it is able to be seen that Canada faced a dramatic drop in the percentage of source of fish imported to the US.
To begin with the table above, 1988 to 2000 witnessed tremendous progress for total value that is able to be obtained. Initially, it stood at just over 6 billion dollars, and erratically, in the next 12 years, it uplifted highly to achieve at well above 10 billion dollars.
In accordance with the pie charts, the source of fish from Canada, which became the most noticeable importer in 1988, dropped enormously over the following 12 years to finish at just across a quarter. In contrast, China rose remarkably between 1988, which was at 13 in 100 in 1988, and 2000, which made up at three-tenths. Nevertheless, other nations saw a fluctuation in the whole period, in which it jumped dramatically in the next 4 years, and suddenly plunged gradually to end at 42% in 2000.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-05 | jenmin | 67 | view |
| 2019-10-27 | damladogan | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-05 | farzad.rahmati_1989 | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-03 | Muhammad Waleed Khan | 78 | view |
| 2019-07-27 | Szprawstyle | 78 | view |
- Bar chart calorie source for UK males at different life periods 81
- The graph below shows the average monthly temperatures in three major cities 92
- The diagrams below show the campus of Riversdale university in 1973 and 2010 65
- The line graph below shows the proportion of population aged 65 and over in USA, Sweden and Japan from 1940 to 2040. 78
- International travel is becoming cheaper, and more and more countries open their door and with more and more tourists.Do the advantages of the increased tourism outweigh its disadvantages? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, nevertheless, so, well, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 949.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62926829268 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63890266164 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556097560976 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.4882285735 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.571428571 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.2857142857 22.9334400587 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.71428571429 5.23603664747 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30777251939 0.215688989381 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148846751056 0.103423049105 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110671618922 0.0843802449381 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208248648348 0.15604864568 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105979973847 0.0819641961636 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.17 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.