In order to improve a country's education system , high school students should be encouraged to openly critique or even criticise their teacher online. Do you agree or disagree with this? What do you think could be better options for impriving the conduct of high school teachers?
Nowadays, arguments on to improve a country's education system have been going on since the practice of teaching began. Allowing high school students to openly criticise their instructors online is a strategy that I feel does not improve the high education quality of a country's high school. The alternative of altered school scheduling and teacher monitoring through video ate better approaches.
Firstly, modified school scheduling improves education in away that openly critiquing teachers does not. For instance as, many modern school boards run education system that take short, periodic week-long breaks throughout the academic year instead of one larger two months break at summertime. Overall, students have just as much holiday time as their peers in traditional school arrangements, but there is not a long. Further, education deterring break at summer, and this permit student to mentally retain of their studies. So this arrangement is clearly a more plausible alternative to arrangement supporting the open criticism of teachers on the internet.
In addition to this, schools should consider videotaping classes to both teacher performance and student conduct. Furthermore, this sort of educational adjustment would also confirm all the critique of the teacher is take away by adults who are much more likely to have insight into what sort of classroom conduct makes a teacher effective. Thus, the structure of this alternative is clear.
In the coclusion, both scheduling and class transparency using video would be more effective in improving schooling systems that online criticism of high school teachers. I thus hope these opinions gain support in the foreseeable future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-04 | Komalsandhu | 78 | view |
- The bar chart shows active participation rates in top ten sports in 1998 and 2005 60
- Today there is increase in anti-social behaviour and lack of respect for others. What might have caused this situation? How to improve it? 73
- The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particulur nation. 90
- The graph shows the data about the annual earning of three different bakeries in London from 2000 to 2010. 73
- Interviews form the basic selection criteria for most large. However, some people think that interviews is not a reliable method of choosing whom to employ and there are other methods to what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 284, Rule ID: SUMMER_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'summer'.
Suggestion: summer
...stead of one larger two months break at summertime. Overall, students have just as much ho...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, so, thus, for instance, i feel, in addition, sort of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1439.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55598455598 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85473654278 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.617760617761 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.2463016304 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.692307692 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9230769231 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.38461538462 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284320338698 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0973778564032 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0580601656683 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168876679959 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0489028026087 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.