Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In the contemporary world, technology plays a prominent role in society, Especially automobiles. So, there is no shortage of debate on future automobile utilization. Although some people might disagree with the statement, if I were asking, I would agree that car usage will reduce in the following years. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
The first reason is the environment. While the petroleum products used in the automobiles enhances the pollution and threats to the environment, the government should take serious action to protect, and the best solution is to limit the vehicles, which are running through gases such as diesel, patrol, and others. The best example to illustrate this point is India, the country where I was born. My home country is one of the largest countries in the world, and most of them have their vehicles. Last two years the percentage pollution has been increasing; as a result, the Indian government implemented a policy - run the personal car in the particular timings and locations, like only use own vehicle in the morning time and not allowed into the downtowns. If this scenario is continuing, the people would probably not show any interest to buy cars in the future.
The second reason is the expenses. In the current scenario, everyone can afford to buy personal cars because most of the automobile companies are providing loans to purchase vehicles, But the problem is with maintenance. Since the cost of fuel and the insurances are increasing drastically, people are not ready to afford such considerable expenses. Consider same India as an example to illustrate this. In my home country, most of them are middle- class people, and they all depend on their monthly paycheck. If the prices for maintenance increases, they would effort it. What more, they stop using personal cars.
In a nutshell, although some people disagree, I believe that car usage would be reduced in the future. I fell this way because of global warming and expenses.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-12 | thonsapon83 | 90 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | nusybah | 70 | view |
| 2019-12-18 | TEJAS PATIL | 70 | view |
| 2019-11-19 | Luis Cortes | 60 | view |
| 2019-10-12 | fofty | 70 | view |
- impact of smoking on society 3
- summarize the points made in the lecture you just heard, explaining how they contradict points made in the reading passage. 85
- do you agree or disagrees with the following statement?Has the easiness of cooking improved life. Give examples and reasons to support your opinion. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Some people think that human needs for farmland, housing, and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals. Do you agree or disagree with this point of view? Why or why not? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, so, while, i feel, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1694.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 337.0 407.700716846 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02670623145 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76813689011 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575667655786 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 533.7 618.680645161 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 67.2985245956 48.9658058833 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.1578947368 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7368421053 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.31578947368 5.45110844103 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162727324932 0.236089414692 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.043199162418 0.076458572812 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.048721036642 0.0737576698707 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0919575091166 0.150856017488 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0382594966477 0.0645574589148 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 11.7677419355 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.