some people believe that allowing children to make their own choices on everyday matters (such as food, clothes and entertainment) is likely to result in a society of individuals who only think about their own wishes. Other people believe that it is important for children to make decisions about matters that affect them
People often argue that either make their own decisions for kids can make them independent or affect their decisions can make kids better in the future. I partly agree that kids should make their own choice, however, a suitable hinder is also important for kids growing.
There are several reasons why I believe that making their own decision can cause a positive growth for children. Each kid has their independent hobbies, he likes running and she loves dolls. The hobbies of everyone are different and we should not affect them to change his mind of interest. For example, the kid hopes to get a dinosaur as soon as a family shop at a toy store, the parent should not block his opinion since it is not crucial and it can let children develop or explore their interest.
On the other hand, the reason to affect their will is that some vital choices could not occur any mistakes. kids do not know why they have to obey the rules of society. some kids may not obey the ritual and parents should affect them to change the mind of kids. everyone should not pass through the traffic road when the traffic light is red, for instance, but some kids may not obey it and throughout with wrong timing. Therefore, adults are responsible for affects the natural mind of the kids as long as their will is a mistake in modern society. Thus, kids should not follow their own decisions as soon as some critical matter.
To sum up, I believe that classify the timing to let kids make their own choices is the most important.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-05-09 | cocococo123 | 56 | view |
- The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five cities between 1990 to 2002 compared with 1989. 78
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negative development? 84
- The pie chart below shows the main reason why agriculture land becomes less productive. The table shows how these effected three regions of the world during the 1990s. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make compar 11
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now, and plans for its development. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 108, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Kids
...l choices could not occur any mistakes. kids do not know why they have to obey the r...
^^^^
Line 3, column 169, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Some
...they have to obey the rules of society. some kids may not obey the ritual and parent...
^^^^
Line 3, column 262, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Everyone
...affect them to change the mind of kids. everyone should not pass through the traffic roa...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 21.0 41.998997996 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1242.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.54945054945 5.12529762239 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.194013829 2.80592935109 78% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.520146520147 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 378.9 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.8934975921 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.5384615385 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07692307692 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22437338127 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0965895261563 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0785988400566 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168461983223 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0399703898953 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.0946893788 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 50.2224549098 134% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.11 12.4159519038 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 78.4519038076 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.