the graph below shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
The line graph illustrates the number of carbon dioxide pollution with each people in four countries, where include United kingdom, sweden, italy and portugal, during 1967 to 2007.
It can be clearly seen that the trend of seriously emissions countries are reducing. By contrast, the emissions of developing countries are increasing.
United kingdom is the leader of carbon emissions at these forty years, kept in 11 metric tonnes gradually at the first ten years, then started the trend of decreasing significantly to 9 metric tonnes until 2007. For sweden, the second high emissions at 1967, rose to 10.5 metric tonnes dramatically at 1977, reached the peak and declined sharply to 7 metric tonnes at 1987, and kept dropped down slightly to 5 metric tonnes after these twenty years.
On the other hand, for italy, started from around 4 metric tonnes to 7 metric tonnes steadily, then higher than sweden and raised to almost 8 metric tonnes until 2007 as well as became the second high emissions country. portugal kept to increase consistently from 1.5 metric millions at 1967 to 5 metric tonnes at 2007, touch with the lowest point of sweden.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-10 | cocococo123 | 78 | view |
| 2017-10-24 | mona_miti | 73 | view |
- The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five cities between 1990 to 2002 compared with 1989. 78
- Some people say History is one of the most important school subjects. Other people think that, in today's world, subjects like Science and Technology are more important than History.Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free. Do you think the advantages of charging for admission outweigh the disadvantages? 56
- the chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The diagram shows the stages and equipment used in cement making process and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 220, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Portugal
...came the second high emissions country. portugal kept to increase consistently from 1.5 ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...touch with the lowest point of sweden.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, then, well, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 961.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03141361257 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50853645236 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591623036649 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 269.1 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.6496575556 43.030603864 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.285714286 112.824112599 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2857142857 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.57142857143 5.23603664747 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194832375762 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108417500791 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0855782890419 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14267703914 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0961150256816 0.0819641961636 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.