Should government build more roads to allow more vehicle owner or improve the network of public transport?
Recently, the phenomenon of developing the public transportation or constructing more roads and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although public transport is beneficial as it is regarded by the substantial number of individuals both constructive and positive, others hold opponent views. I am inclined to believe that this issue can be plus as it could develop some brilliant aspects for its adherents.
From a social standpoint, expanding the public transport systems can provide the society with noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact of development. From my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the advantages of developing public transport. Firstly, this type of transportation diminish the traffic congestion which is the main cause of declining the amount of carbon dioxide emission and air pollution. Furthermore, public transportation is cheaper and more safety than the personal vehicles which leads to decreasing the number of car accidents.Hence, the public transport saves a considerable amount of time and money annually which is one of the paramount elements in the economic growth.
On the one hand, there is no doubt that the idea of investing and developing the public transportation in big cities including subways, monorails and buses insteading of new roads has some opponents. According to research undertaken by a prestigious world-renowned university, loads of inhabitatnts much prefer to utilize their own cars. They asserted that the own vehicles are more comfortable and convenient and they need more new roads and streets to drive.
In conclusion, while there are different compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the merits of expanding the public transportation insteading building roads for vehicles are far more outweigh their demerits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-17 | lovedeepkaur2000 | 77 | view |
| 2019-12-17 | Shruti gupta radhika | 85 | view |
| 2019-11-19 | manpreet9999 | 77 | view |
| 2019-09-09 | vahora juber | 77 | view |
| 2019-09-06 | prabhdyal | 11 | view |
- We have entered a throw-away society and fill the environment with rubbish. What are the causes and what are your solutions? 11
- Is travel a necessary component of education or not? Will scholar sitting at home have more knowledge or not? 88
- It is important to preserve the beautiful buildings of the past, even if it will be expensive to do so. To what extent do you agree or disagree with it. 11
- Government should allocate sources prior to the technology research, do you agree or disagree? Give your own experience and examples. 77
- Governments promise continuous economic growth, but it is actually illusion. Some people think that governments should abandon this. Give your opinion. 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 621, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Hence
... decreasing the number of car accidents.Hence, the public transport saves a considera...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, so, while, in conclusion, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1607.0 1207.87684729 133% => OK
No of words: 287.0 242.827586207 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.59930313589 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26783575181 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585365853659 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 379.143842365 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.4082159545 50.4703680194 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.090909091 104.977214359 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0909090909 20.9669160288 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.72727272727 7.25397266985 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295659496866 0.242375264174 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109593813659 0.0925447433944 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0872676874552 0.071462118173 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18595102989 0.151781067708 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0361835854227 0.0609392437508 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 12.6369458128 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 53.1260098522 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.5 11.5310837438 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.04 8.32886699507 121% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 55.0591133005 169% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.