Should government build more roads on allow more vehicle owner or improve the network of public transport?
The importance of improving the network of public transport by government which was always debatable was now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while others reject this notion. The substantial influence of this trend has sparked the controversy over the potential impact in recent years. In my opinion the former proposition appears to be more rational. This essay will further elaborate my views for favouring the positive impact of this trend and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
There are myriad of reasons which will further elaborate this argument but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that this will ultimately reduce the pollution level because individual will prefer public transport as their mode of accommodation. Another pivotal aspect of this trend is that this significant step will also reduce the traffic on the roads and it will prove to be boon our environment . Needless to say, all these merits stand in a good stead.
Elaborating my viewpoint there are some more merits but one of the crucial effects is that it also increases the revenue of the running organisation. Hence, it is apparent why many are favour of this trend.
According to the arguments aforementioned above, one can reach to a conclusion that the benefits improving the network of public tranport by government are indeed too great to ignore.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-17 | lovedeepkaur2000 | 77 | view |
| 2019-12-17 | Shruti gupta radhika | 85 | view |
| 2019-11-19 | manpreet9999 | 77 | view |
| 2019-09-09 | vahora juber | 77 | view |
| 2019-09-06 | prabhdyal | 11 | view |
- Should government build more roads on allow more vehicle owner or improve the network of public transport? 85
- Some people think that government should spend as much money as possible as developing innovation science and technology other people disagree and think that this money should spent on basic needs. Which one of these options do you agree with? 77
- Can money bring happiness? What are the factors for happiness? 85
- Technological access to online music and the like should be free or paid. What do you think? 85
- Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are youngsters role model. Do you support it or not? 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 408, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...it will prove to be boon our environment . Needless to say, all these merits stand...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, while, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1176.0 1207.87684729 97% => OK
No of words: 227.0 242.827586207 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18061674009 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80082925328 2.71678728327 103% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 139.433497537 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599118942731 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 366.3 379.143842365 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.159488776 50.4703680194 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.6 104.977214359 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7 20.9669160288 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 7.25397266985 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158682932589 0.242375264174 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0614450808947 0.0925447433944 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.071070343417 0.071462118173 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0998575854407 0.151781067708 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0475927646489 0.0609392437508 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 12.6369458128 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.1260098522 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 11.5310837438 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.32886699507 110% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 55.0591133005 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.