archeology in the twentieth century
The reading and the lecture are both about the artifacts and archeological sites in Britain. The author of reading says that archeologists from the twentieth century have faced serious problems and limitations to discover the old artifacts. The lecturer casts doubt on the points made in the reading passage. He thinks that new guideline has improved and fixed the rules in archeology.
First of all, the author states that in Britain from 1950 there were many buildings built, but archeologists did not preserved artifacts, so they were destroyed. This point is challenged by the lecturer. He says that according to new rules in a construction site is examined by the archeologist before they start construction. If any artifacts found by them, then building build around that site or artifacts extract from that site and preserved by them.
Secondly, the author states that all archeology research funded by the government, so many projects left without support. The lecturer refutes this point and asserts that new rules suggest that funds will be provided by the constructors since they have to pay for the inspection of their site. Therefore, archeologists can get enough funds to research on artifacts.
Finally, the author mentions that there are few government agencies that provided the job of archeology. So, archeologists have to end up their career. The lecturer, on the other hand, states that archeologists have a different designation. They hired in different stages to perform the research work or publish the article and for other works. Additionally, archeologists are highest in numbers today.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 242, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...itations to discover the old artifacts. The lecturer casts doubt on the points made...
^^^
Line 3, column 118, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'preserve'
Suggestion: preserve
...ldings built, but archeologists did not preserved artifacts, so they were destroyed. This...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1369.0 1373.03311258 100% => OK
No of words: 257.0 270.72406181 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32684824903 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94304415186 2.5805825403 114% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556420233463 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 402.3 419.366225166 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.4120342471 49.2860985944 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.5625 110.228320801 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0625 21.698381199 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.9375 7.06452816374 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0842880662008 0.272083759551 31% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0246495449712 0.0996497079465 25% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0546722152261 0.0662205650399 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0574242866934 0.162205337803 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0757444853863 0.0443174109184 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.