Research shows that business meetings, discussions and training are happening online nowadays. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
As technology constantly develops, many companies can now conduct online conferences and training seminars for their staff. While the advantages of this can eclipse the downsides if multinational corporations hold virtual meetings as a way to reduce budget and travel time, the opposite can be the case if small businesses provide online training for their staff.
In multinational corporations, the benefits will be far more significant. In fact, the advantages offered by distance communication are closely associated with cost effectiveness, which is always of top priority of a business. Companies have to incur several types of finance, which include training sites rental to be able to organize a conventional conferences. By these means of interactions, organizations could significantly cut back on unnecessary expenses and accordingly increase their profit. The time saving merit of virtual meetings is another thing worth mentioning. The board of directors for Tan Tao Industrial Group, for example, are not required to travel back and forth to attend meetings happening in another venue.
As for small firms, however, the negative implications will be more considerable.In fact, participants of a virtual conference may lose focus if the programs are too lengthy or the gathering itself aims to process too much information. As a result, the purpose and quality of these activities could fail to meet their initial expectations. It is believed that business partnerships are best established with face-to-face interactions as they allow for personal contact, which are conducive to mutual trust building. Failing to accommodate those interpersonal values leads to undesired misunderstandings among partners or employees.
In conclusion, although it is generally more advantageous if virtual meetings are held by multinational corporations, however, the benefits will be overshadowed by their drawbacks in case smaller firms rely on this form of interaction.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-13 | Vo Phan Minh Hieu | 89 | view |
- Some people think the government funding should not be used for supporting art and culture, while others think supporting cultural activities may be beneficial for the population and the culture. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 78
- The animal species are becoming extinct due to human activities on land and in the sea. What are the reasons and solutions? 11
- People are surrounded by all kinds of advertising. They both have important and negative influences to our lives. Agree or Disagree? 84
- Nowadays, some employer think academic qualities are more important than life experience and personal qualities when they choose employees? Why does this take place? And this is negative or positive development? 84
- The best way to resolve the international environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel. To what extent do you agree? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 82, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
... implications will be more considerable.In fact, participants of a virtual confere...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, however, if, may, so, while, another thing, as for, for example, in conclusion, in fact, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1686.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.73469387755 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.38926420504 2.80592935109 121% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615646258503 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 530.1 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.7359449415 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.692307692 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6153846154 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.69230769231 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0865964580468 0.244688304435 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0277484855011 0.084324248473 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0339771038068 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.054207576946 0.151304729494 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0419206383817 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.25 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.37 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.