The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph illustrates how the number of items transferred by four distinct transport ways changed in Britain from 1974 to 2002.
Overall, it is clear that the quantities of goods transported by road, water and pipelines experienced an erratic upward trend, while the number of items transferred by rail remained almost constant during the given period.
As can be seen from the graph that the largest quantities of goods transported both in 1974 and in 2002 by roads (around 70 and 98 million tonnes respectively), whereas the lowest number of items transferred in tandem in 1974 and 2002 by pipeline (approximately 5 and 22 million tonnes respectively). In contrast, at the beginning of the period, the number of goods transferred by water stood at 40 million tonnes and remained steady during the next 4 years. Over the 4 years, there was a noticeable growth to approximately 55 million tonnes in transported goods by water, after which it plateaued for around 20 years before starting to rise gradually again.
Regarding good transported by rail, the figure showed an erratic downward trend from around 40 to 25 million tonnes in the years 1974-1994. Over the next 8 years, the quantities of goods transported by rail back to the same level as at the beginning.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-21 | PsycRicky | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-16 | Raksadil | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-16 | Adilrahi | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-27 | happyhappy | 61 | view |
| 2019-11-28 | bibikulsum | 84 | view |
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity 61
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.Discuss both these views and give y 73
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate at fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 73
- Archaeologists have recently found a fossil of a 150-million-year-old mammalknown as Repenornamus robustus (R. robustus). Interestingly, the mammal'sstomach contained the remains of a psittacosaur dinosaur. Some researchers havetherefore suggested th 3
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodations in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
regarding, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1056.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95774647887 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84822954808 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525821596244 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 295.2 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.8542447304 43.030603864 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.857142857 112.824112599 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.4285714286 22.9334400587 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202645254246 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110452641608 0.103423049105 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0504167942279 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142314529334 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0353908621349 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.2329268293 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.95 61.2550243902 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.08 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.4329268293 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.