The text is discussing salvage logging which defines it as a way we aim to deal with dead trees and remove them and provides three reasons of support. The professor goes against all of the explained reasons and tells us why she is against the text.
The reading and lecture are both about salvage logging after forest damage. The article states that salvage logging is beneficial for both forest and the economy and provide three reasons of support. However, the professor explains that salvage logging may be helpful but results in longer term have disadvantages more than the benefits and refutes each of the author reasons.
Firstly, the article mentions that if the dead trees are not removed it will take years to decompose. salvage logging make space for new trees. The lecturer counters this by saying natural process of decomposition make soil richer and it is suitable for next generation of trees.
Secondly, the article claims that the damage forest is a suitable place for insects which is in a large amount are harmful for healthy trees. The professor contends that it's true that the number of insect’s increase but they aren't necessarily harmful for example there is some insect in Alaskan forest and they never hurt the forest and also the forest is not only a place for insects it is a home for birds and the other animals too.
Thirdly, it is stated in the article that salvage logging has economic benefits there is a lot of industrial product that relate to wood and may be trees harmed from fire but still can provide much wood that is usable by industrials. The lecture opposes this point. He said that it does not last very long and the jobs created are just temporary jobs and it hasn't real economic benefits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-15 | fafa jan | 83 | view |
| 2018-07-13 | nastaran1992 | 73 | view |
- TPO-20 - Integrated Writing Task 70
- TPO 19 integrated essayMany consumers ignore commercial advertisements. In response, advertising companies have started using a new tactic, called “buzzing." The advertisers hire people,buzzers,who personally promote (buzz) products to people they 73
- The text is discussing salvage logging which defines it as a way we aim to deal with dead trees and remove them and provides three reasons of support. The professor goes against all of the explained reasons and tells us why she is against the text. 83
- TPO 11: a decline in reading the literature 73
- reading passage was about evidences for recognizing a portrait of Jane Austen - mahdieh 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 103, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Salvage
...emoved it will take years to decompose. salvage logging make space for new trees. The l...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 231, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...mber of insect's increase but they arent necessarily harmful for example there i...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 359, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: hasn't
... created are just temporary jobs and it hasnt real economic benefits.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, third, thirdly, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 7.30242825607 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 17.0 30.3222958057 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1241.0 1373.03311258 90% => OK
No of words: 256.0 270.72406181 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84765625 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36745499211 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546875 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 388.8 419.366225166 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 75.2583429383 49.2860985944 153% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.818181818 110.228320801 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2727272727 21.698381199 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.18181818182 7.06452816374 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122220345576 0.272083759551 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0538386796851 0.0996497079465 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0557267485751 0.0662205650399 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0777535070451 0.162205337803 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0580814338811 0.0443174109184 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.8541721854 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.