The graph below shows the population of particular country by age group starting in 1960 and including a forecast to 2040
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:150%"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;mso-bidi-font-size:11.0pt;line-height:150%;font-family:
"Times New Roman",serif">Given is the line graph illustrating the percentage of
population in a specific country according to three age groups over the course
of 80 years from 1960 and a projection to 2040. </span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:150%"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;mso-bidi-font-size:11.0pt;line-height:150%;font-family:
"Times New Roman",serif">It is obvious that the most significant proportion of
total population has belonged to the 15-64-year-old group. And while the rate
of the senior is expected to increase, the reverse is true for the other age
groups during the time given.</span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:150%"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;mso-bidi-font-size:11.0pt;line-height:150%;font-family:
"Times New Roman",serif">In 1960, 55% of population were teenagers and adults,
which was nearly double the figure for the youngest group and triple figure for
the oldest one, with exactly 30% and 15%, respectively. The percentage of
citizens who aged from 15 to 64 experienced a fluctuation three decades later,
prior to being subjected to a marked decrease toward the end of the survey,
ending at approximately 45%.</span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:150%"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;mso-bidi-font-size:11.0pt;line-height:150%;font-family:
"Times New Roman",serif">Between 1960 and 1990, there was a remarkable drop of
10% in the rate of population aging less than 14 years old, which is then predicted
to decline gradually to reach the trough at 10% in 2040. Meanwhile, the statistic
for the 65-and-plus group has surged by 30% and is going to peak at the same
level as the 15-64 group. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-28 | jaspreet singh11 | 84 | view |
| 2022-01-22 | phanhhh | 78 | view |
| 2021-12-01 | HonZun | 67 | view |
| 2021-11-26 | dzung2406 | view | |
| 2020-03-09 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 89 | view |
- The bar chart shows the number of cars per 1000 people in 5 countries in Europe over the 3 years 2005, 2009, 2015, compared with the European average. Summaries the given information and show comparison which relative 78
- Men and women are different in terms of their characteristics and abilities. For this reason,some jobs are better done by men and others by women.Do you agree or disagree? 78
- In the modern world, mobile and smartphone use has become universal in most parts of the world. Although there are clearly many advantages of this technology, there are many who believe it also brings many disadvantages. Discuss both points of view and gi 89
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words. 78
- The charts below give information on the ages of population of Yemen and Italy in 2002 and projection for 2050. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 28, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , serif&apos
...ont-family: "Times New Roman",serif'>Given is the line graph illustrating t...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 28, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , serif&apos
...ont-family: "Times New Roman",serif'>It is obvious that the most significan...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 28, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , serif&apos
...ont-family: "Times New Roman",serif'>In 1960, 55% of population were teenag...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 28, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , serif&apos
...ont-family: "Times New Roman",serif'>Between 1960 and 1990, there was a rem...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1877.0 965.302439024 194% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 8.41704035874 4.92477711251 171% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 13.5181482683 2.65546596893 509% => Word_Length_SD is high.
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57399103139 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 283.868780488 165% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.1 1.45097560976 145% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 44.0 22.4926829268 196% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 173.109676217 43.030603864 402% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 375.4 112.824112599 333% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 44.6 22.9334400587 194% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.8 5.23603664747 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 19.0 3.83414634146 496% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.083808767838 0.215688989381 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0682169263085 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0265459684068 0.0843802449381 31% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0482484779952 0.15604864568 31% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0520814476664 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 40.5 13.2329268293 306% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -15.48 61.2550243902 -25% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 15.9 6.51609756098 244% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 26.3 10.3012195122 255% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 32.44 11.4140731707 284% => Coleman_liau_index is high.
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 22.5 11.4329268293 197% => OK
gunning_fog: 19.6 10.9970731707 178% => OK
text_standard: 23.0 11.0658536585 208% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.