The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999.
The table shows the different categories of relatives who are poverty, have types of all households like single aged person, aged couple, single, no children, couple, no children, sole parent, couple with children and in Australia in 1999.
According to the data, percentage of sole parent by living in poverty in Australia was the higher rating that was 21% (232.000) than single, no children or couple with children has under percentage which amounted 20% proportion of the type poverty. Also, percentage of the couple, no children by Australia, which had 7% (211.000), followed by single aged person amount 6% (54.000), than aged couple 4% (48.000). Moreover, aged couple, that was the lower position percentage of person poverty, followed by single aged person and couple, no children.
Percentage of household type living in poverty had the contras to couple with children the higher position than others by Australia in 1999.
Ultimately, there were many types of household to realize 11% ( 1,837,000), but the higher rating was couple with children in 1999.
- How do movies or television influence people’s behavior? Use reasonsand specific examples to support your answer. 55
- The chart shows the number of mobile phones and landlines per 100 people in selected countries. Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information given. 50
- What is the most important animal in your country? Why is the animal important? Use reason 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Only people whoearn a lot of money are successful. Use specific reasons and examples tosupport your answer. 50
- The graph below gives information about the preferred leisure activities of Australian children. Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown.You should write at least 150 words. 70
Sentence: Percentage of household type living in poverty had the contras to couple with children the higher position than others by Australia in 1999.
Error: contras Suggestion: No alternate word
flaws:
The essay didn't depict the table clearly.
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 4.5 out of 9
Category: Poor Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 1 2
No. of Sentences: 6 10
No. of Words: 170 200
No. of Characters: 848 1000
No. of Different Words: 75 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.611 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.988 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.478 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 75 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 43 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 34 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 19 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 28.333 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.117 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.5 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.649 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.884 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.358 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4