In many cities, there is little control over the design and construction of new houses. Some people think that people can choose to build houses in their own styles instead of building them with the same as the old house style in local areas. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
Different countries have distinct cultures, and these are reflected in various aspects of life including house designs. In yesteryears, people often designed their houses based on geographical and traditional considerations. However, with the advent of technology, exchanges among cultures became very swift and beyond control thus, influencing the way people build and adorn their homes. In my opinion, having a single house design in cities is more advantageous than having several ones. Though variety exhibits the creativity of people in the place, uniformity is still more beneficial in as much as economics, safety, and maintenance are concerned.
In terms of economics, cities can save more spaces if they regulate the sizes of houses that can be built in their jurisdictions. Available spaces can be used for commercial purposes which will eventually result in more job opportunities. Means of living, I think, is more important than grand designs.
Moreover, having uniformity promotes safety. If only houses duly designed by national and local authorities shall be constructed, the citizens can be assured of the quality of the buildings. The agency in charge of urban development knows better the type of structure that would best withstand possible calamities which might strike the place.
Finally, maintaining houses can be done easily if there is uniformity. The city leaders can help provide affordable materials for repainting and repairing houses. By doing this, the overall aesthetics of the region are bound to be preserved, and hence greatly contributes to avoiding cities looking like squatter areas – disorganized, untidy, and crowded.
In conclusion, the only advantage of having multiple designs of houses in cities is its showcasing of the creativity of people but the benefits of having a single design are far greater. Following a model house from the government is good for the economy, is safer, and promotes easy maintenance.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-05-02 | MiaPhan_09 | 56 | view |
| 2022-05-02 | MiaPhan_09 | 56 | view |
| 2020-07-03 | thanh nguyen qc | 73 | view |
| 2020-04-02 | Anonymous | 78 | view |
| 2020-04-02 | Anonymous | 79 | view |
- The charts show the distribution of employment among agriculture industry CN and services in three countries in 1980 and 2020 85
- Television is dangerous because it destroys family life and any sense of community instead of visiting people or talking with our family we just watch television To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 89
- Students learn more from their school teachers than from other sources such as the internet or television To what extent you agree or disagree with this statement 78
- Task 2 Some employers find that their new employees lack in basic interpersonal skills such as lack of ability to work with colleagues as a team What are the causes of this problem Suggest solutions 84
- There seems to be an increasing trend towards assessing students through exams rather than through continual assessment What are the advantages and disadvantages of exams as a form of assessment 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, however, if, look, moreover, so, still, thus, i think, in conclusion, kind of, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1634.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41059602649 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96249379029 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579470198675 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 513.9 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.1981921764 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.1176470588 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7647058824 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.58823529412 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21218098486 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0682392944101 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0510333807496 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114024236972 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0425278335757 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.8 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.