Development in technology has brought various environmental problems. Some believe that people need to live simpler lives to solve environmental problems. Others, however, believe technology is the way to solve these problems. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Technology has been developing at alarming rate in contemporary era. A recent few decades are witness of development in technology sector. Amid this development, there is one phenomenon that has associated with it. In order to this phenomenon, faction of people concede that they need to give the simplest life to tackle the environment problems while other believe that technology is only way to combat with this problem. I will try to throw light upon the determination of environment problems. Also, I will try to posit my perspective about it.
To commence with, there are multifarious reasons to shore those people who are in favor of human need to live ordinary life to fight against the problems. First and foremost, people should walk or use cycle instead of cars to clear the environment from exhaust fumes from the car which leads to air pollution. Additionally, people should try to cut the consumption of electricity as well as try to use renewable resources like sun for brightness or some equipment to make dishes through sun rays. In terms of industry sector, they do not depend on machinery or robot which is main source of air contamination but except of machinery, they should work by hand as people can get money from the work and it tends to decline the pollution.
On the other side of spectrum, there are several points that made out in favor of technology is only way to tackle this problems. The predominant reason is developing technology has mach more merits. To prove, advent of electric for commuting to their work or travel. Because it is cheaper and more eco-friendly than fuel car. Moreover, other car need fossil fuel for running on road while electric car need only electricity from whatever sources. The another reason, introducing a machinery related to recycle the paper, bottle or other material is one of the best alternative option to decrease the environmental contamination.
Aggelomerating, all the point, I elaborate a above it can be concluded that pros of technology to mitigate the spread of pollution in atmosphere. Outweigh the cons of it. That is why, I support those people who are in favor of usage of technology is one way to tackle the problem because it is more fruitful in my eyes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-20 | VanChungNguyen | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-27 | Bao Ngoc Tho | 78 | view |
| 2022-09-12 | Hai Anh Phan Thi | 89 | view |
| 2022-08-15 | baokhuyen759 | 89 | view |
| 2022-07-28 | lehonganh1212 | 89 | view |
- Life was better when technology was simpler. To what extent do you agree and disagree? 73
- Many Offenders commit more crime after serving the first punishments. Why is this happening and what measures can be taken to tackle this problems. 73
- The charts summarise the weight measurements of people living in Charlestown in 1955 and 2015. 67
- The two graphs show the main sources of energy in the USA in the 1980 and the 1990s. 78
- The charts show how selected age groups purchased concert,cinema and theatre tickets online over first three months of 2006 in three countries and how the internet was accessed. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 116, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...vor of technology is only way to tackle this problems. The predominant reason is dev...
^^^^
Line 5, column 187, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...reason is developing technology has mach more merits. To prove, advent of electri...
^^
Line 7, column 44, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...elomerating, all the point, I elaborate a above it can be concluded that pros of ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, so, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 71.0 41.998997996 169% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1866.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 380.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91052631579 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88116916096 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531578947368 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 605.7 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.9220810422 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.2105263158 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.10526315789 7.06120827912 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199984584714 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0550674107317 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0505807711939 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111575003407 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0334899057993 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.