Some people think that young people should be required to do unpaid work helping people in the community. Are disadvantages of this requirement greater than the benefits for the community and individuals?
Social service is moral responsiblity of every person for the community. A recent decade are witness of development in social sector. Amid this development, there is one phenomenon that has associated with it. In order to this phenomenon, every younger people ought to be needed to cater their service at free of cost for helping people in community. But there are several advantages related to work for free for society outweigh the drawbacks that are connected with it. I will try that throw light upon pros and cons of doing job for society at free. Also, I will try to posit my perspective about it.
To begin with, there are multifarious positive aspects to shore those people who are in favor of play a social role without expecting anything in return. First and foremost reason is that adult people have profound knowledge about education and technology. Thereby, they can be done to offer their knowledge and skill for that community who has lack of education and financially poor for complete their schooling. This may result in making productive and creative society for further future. The another merit is that they can not cater only education and skill but also attained some retirement home for spending some time with helpless people, they can make them happy by cracking some jokes or do some entertainment act in front of them. Thus, they are proud if themselves as they are pivotal part of community. Because our ancestors say that " laughter is the best medicine in the world". Hence, these are potential benefits if young generation work for society for free.
On the other side of spectrum, despite having positive aspects, it also have some negative aspects. The main impact is working as a volunteer may distract the adult from their priorities. For instance, students who have an extensive burden of education and complete assignment or preparation for assessment. Therefore, they do not have much leisure time to work for society but in their free time they play some sport for relaxation. This may result in to worki in charity may led to suffer from some mental disorder.
Aggelomerating, all the point I elaborated an above, it can be concluded that plethora of harmful effect social worker if they are doing it with some other task but it tends to positive impact for society to make quality livelihood and productive society. That is why, I support those people who are in favor of social worker has played their role without hoping any cost. Hence, it is more fruitful in my opinion.
- Some people think that people who choose a job early and keep doing it are more likely to get a satisfying in their career life than those who frequently change jobs.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Accommodation and transport problems are increasing in many large cities. Businesses are encouraged to move to rural areas. Do advantages outweigh disadvantages? 73
- The map below is of the town of Garlsdon. A new supermarket (S) is planned for the town. The map shows two possible sites for the supermarket.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The pie chart shows the amount of money that a children's charity located in the USA spent and received in one year, 2016. 89
- Many people join distance-learning programmes (study material, post, TV, Internet) and study at home, but some people think that it cannot bring the same benefit as attending colleges or universities does. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 73, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'has'?
Suggestion: has
...espite having positive aspects, it also have some negative aspects. The main impact ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, may, so, therefore, thus, for instance, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 24.0651302605 199% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2111.0 1615.20841683 131% => OK
No of words: 428.0 315.596192385 136% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93224299065 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.548423998 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61299264978 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 176.041082164 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514018691589 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 684.0 506.74238477 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 5.43587174349 258% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.1531297149 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.7826086957 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6086956522 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.21739130435 7.06120827912 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235192364933 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0647725889507 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0586575836972 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146775149402 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0448275904504 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.