Thebar chart shows the divorce rates in two European countries from 2011 to 2015
A breakdown of changes in the number of divorce in two different countries between 2011 and 2015 is depicted by the bar chart. Overall, divorce rates in finland experienced a slight improvement, whereas Sweden decreased sharply. Although in the first period, Sweden ranked first, finland had successfully overtaken Sweden in the end of period.
Initially, in first year, finland and Sweden stood at just under 38% and approximately forty five percent, respectively. A considerable fall was shown in the figure for Sweden, while finland increased gradually and surpassed Sweden in 2015, with just over two fifth.
it is clear that, finland suffered a moderate drop in the first two years before it climbed constantly in the next following years. Unlikely, there was a marginal rise in the number of divorce in Sweden from 2011 to 2015, with almost a half. However, after that period, this saw a gradual plummet to around 38% in the last year.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-02 | beatrice babirye matovu | 78 | view |
- the graph below shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Portugal, and Italy between 1967 and 2007. 78
- The graph below shows how people buy music Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 75
- the graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the united kingdom, sweden,italy, and portugal between 1967 and 2007. 78
- The graph below shows how people buy music Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The graph below shows how people buy music Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Comments
The bar chart illustrates the
The bar chart illustrates the divorce rates between two European countries of Finland and Sweden between 2011 and 2015. It can be seen that the numbers of Finish divorcees fell drastically from a rate of 350 in 2011 to 300 in 2012, but rose again through the years that followed, raising at a steady fast rate of twenty percent.
The Swedish divorcees on the other hand, start relatively high at a starting point of 420 rate in 2011 and continue to raise at a twenty percent rate in 2012. However, the numbers gradually decline between 2013 and 2015, making a significant decrease of about fifty percent each decade. This led to raise in rate of Finish Divorcees from 380 to 400 in this period.
Although, Sweden continue to make up the high divorce in the two European countries, the Finish divorcee rate sharply increase in this period. In 2013 for example, shows that there were two Finish divorcees to every three Swedish divorcees, but by 2015, this rate had narrowed down to a ten percent rate of Swedish divorcees.
Overall, we can see a clear upward trend in the Finish divorcees, while the Swedish divorcees seen to have leveled off.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 69, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nland and Sweden stood at just under 38% and approximately forty five percent, re...
^^
Line 2, column 261, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'fifth' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'fifths'.
Suggestion: fifths
...ssed Sweden in 2015, with just over two fifth. it is clear that, finland suffered a...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...en in 2015, with just over two fifth. it is clear that, finland suffered a moder...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 788.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 156.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05128205128 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53411884305 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71025762317 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.628205128205 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 231.3 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 17.1969292317 43.030603864 40% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.5 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197018349511 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0943544263204 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112568842294 0.0843802449381 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135220499958 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0688488804129 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.