The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries.
The line chart compares the rates of people, who are aged 65 and more, in the USA, Sweden, and Japan, from 1940 to 2040.
Overall, the percentage of elderly people in the USA was higher than two remain countries in 1940 while this figure in Japan is expected to overcome the numbers in the USA and Sweden in 2040.
The rates of elderly people increased quickly, in the USA and Sweden, from 9% and 7% (1940) to 15% and 14% (1980), respectively. Besides, the percentage of people were aged over 65 in Japan decrease slightly from 5% (1940) to 4% (1985) before rising rapidly to 10% (2030).
The proportion of elderly people, in the USA, reduce slightly from 15% (1980) to 14% (2020) before climbing quickly to 24 % (2040). During this time, this figure of Sweden fluctuate from 14% to 25% and surpass the number of the USA in 1995. Besides, the proportion of people are aged over 65, in Japan, is predicted to overcome the figures of two other countries in 2035 and continuously grow to a peak of 27% (2040).
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-27 | Thang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-08 | uzubermy1@gmail.com | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-08 | uzubermy1@gmail.com | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | Sakil | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-02 | ahmadrava88 | 67 | view |
- The tradition that the family gets together to eat meals is disappearing.What are the reasons? What are the impacts? 73
- The bar chart below shows the estimated sales of jeans for two companies next year in Turkey. The pie chart shows the projected market share of the two companies in jeans at the end of next year. 67
- The media should include more stories which report good news. To whatextent do you agree or disagree? 61
- The charts below give information on the ages of populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050. 67
- The line charts compare the number of people who emigrate and immigrate in the UK while the bar graph shows the net of migration between 1999 and 2008. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 815.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.47802197802 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.336984129 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.478021978022 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 234.9 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.4626500695 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.428571429 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169335155575 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0944162153076 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0642073562441 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120971380534 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0383043013829 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.0 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.