Should governments invest in arts more than sports or not?
Personally, I think governments should finance artistic affairs and not sports.
For example, about 10 years ago, a prominent Iranian actor, Mehdi Fathi died after bearing months of illness. The newspapers wrote, at that time, that he was very poor when he got old. The hospital that he was there announced to his family that if they were not able to afford the costs, they should exit the hospital. The disease was hard to cure. His family had not the money to fund his cure. Inevitably, they took him back to their home, and after a few weeks he died. Although he was not a handsome guy, but he was the most skillful actor ever that Iran's history showed. He played memorable roles in movies like Adambarfi and Eteraz and popular TV series such as Imam Ali. It was so sad. If governments support sports more than art the artists will die from poverty.
Another example, recently, there has been a debate in Iran between pop music stars and classical music stars. The debate had originated in the government's decision to identify the amounts of money bestowed to music groups based on how many people they can bring to their concerts. The classical artists claimed that the audience of their performance are, mostly, constituted of well-educated classes of the society such as doctors, engineers, and professors. Thus, they have a limited audience in comparison with pop musicians. So, in such a way, the classical music will perish and cannot endure in the market. The same evaluation should be done between art, generally, and sports. Sports have a lot of people who pay to see the games in stadiums, but generally speaking, art works have less audience. Thus, it is more important for arts to obtain state support that it is for sports because arts will die, if they have not governmental finance.
For those reasons, I think governments should support art rather than sport.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-24 | jjj33333 | 60 | view |
| 2022-10-24 | jjj33333 | 60 | view |
| 2022-07-12 | Seyed Armin Mirhosseini | 83 | view |
| 2022-07-11 | heman@saini | 70 | view |
| 2022-05-16 | sona1988 | 80 | view |
- It is important to know about events happening around the world, even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life. 80
- Bayside schools are doing a poor job because the test scores, graduation and college admission rates are low. 59
- Young people enjoy life more than older people do. 73
- Loyalty can be detrimental too. 50
- The best way to start a new business is to buy a franchise. 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nance artistic affairs and not sports. For example, about 10 years ago, a promi...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 324, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...e costs, they should exit the hospital. The disease was hard to cure. His family ha...
^^^
Line 2, column 698, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...series such as Imam Ali. It was so sad. If governments support sports more than ar...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...art the artists will die from poverty. Another example, recently, there has bee...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...if they have not governmental finance. For those reasons, I think governments s...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, thus, well, for example, i think, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 52.1666666667 63% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1558.0 1977.66487455 79% => OK
No of words: 324.0 407.700716846 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80864197531 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48683471472 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.586419753086 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 618.680645161 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.9738941278 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.9 100.406767564 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2 20.6045352989 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.7 5.45110844103 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 11.8709677419 17% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252055716331 0.236089414692 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0753744738695 0.076458572812 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.125878672857 0.0737576698707 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208511037285 0.150856017488 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116701510217 0.0645574589148 181% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 11.7677419355 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.32 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 86.8835125448 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.