The different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one European city from 1960 to 2000
The different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one European city from 1960 to 2000 is presented in the bar graph.
Overall, the percentage of train increased steadily while a steady decrease was shown in the tube percentage and both of them had fluctuation. The number of car percentage showed a significant rise while the figures for the bus percentage decreased dramatically. Again, the number of bus percentage was the lowest part rather than train, car, and tube.
The figures for the percentage of train rose steadily from virtually 20 to around 27 percent between 1960 and 1980, a rise of about 7 percent in a 20-year period. The car percentage also increased dramatically by more or less 20. However, a steady decrease was experienced in the number of tube percentage to just above 20. The figures for the bus percentage showed a significant decline, decreasing to around 25.
By 2000, the percentage of train had continued to decline steadily to approximately 22 while the tube percentage had inclined slightly to 25 percent. After a long period, a significant incline had been shown in the figures for the number of car percentage to just under 40 while the percentage of bus has shown around a threefold decrease and reached by far the least popular transportation mode in one European city.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-09 | fajarilyas | 67 | view |
| 2019-06-09 | fajarilyas | 67 | view |
- Transportation 67
- schools have several problems with students’ behaviour 78
- The different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one European city from 1960 to 2000 67
- Foster Road 84
- the quantity of Japanese who travel out of Japan from 1985 to 1990 and the market proportion of Japanese tourist traveling to Australia 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, while, more or less
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1109.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 225.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92888888889 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.889059824 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.471111111111 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 345.6 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 11.0 4.33902439024 254% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.085118101 43.030603864 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.9 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.2 5.23603664747 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188354386581 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105974198641 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.249456599478 0.0843802449381 296% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.244719339457 0.15604864568 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.348829450144 0.0819641961636 426% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.