Due to human activities on land and in the sea, the animals are becoming extinct. What are the reasons and Solutions?
Currently, many of animal species are becoming endangered in both terrestrial and coastal regions. This is mainly caused by the increasing number of people eating fish and the development of housing areas. Therefore, fish extensive harvesting and establishment of vertical housing are the practically implemented solutions to solve those issues.
Two ways of human activities disturbing animal habitats in the land and sea are the demand of fish consumption and shelters. As fish is well-known for its high protein contents, more people seem to be consider to consume fish regularly in the great amount. This gives rise to the number of people eating fish healthier as well as living longer. The more people live longer, the more houses they need. The residents in Japan recently eat fish, increasing 3 times compared to a decade ago, and it leads to the increment of residential area. If the developers establish new space for housing, the green area in land as the habitats will decrease making those become extinct. Not only this, considerable fish harvesting in that country also tends to endanger the sea animals.
What can be done to tackle these issues? Two major effective solutions are to adapt fish extensive farming as well as build vertical residents. The reason for this is to sustain the number of fish in coastal areas getting a dramatic decline due to a significant demand of fish consumed. What is more, vertical housing is believed to minimize the use of lands led by overpopulation massively requiring more shelters. For example, a developing country such as Indonesia has successfully implemented the harvesting of catfish, and it gives rise to sufficiently supply the fish consumption for a year. In addition, Indonesia also simultaneously builds some apartments to solve the essential problems caused by the establishment of horizontal housings.
To sum up, the increment of residents eating fish and the housing development are two leading causes why the animals become vanished gradually. Hence, the practical solutions to reduce those vital problems are utilizing fish extensive farming and building vertical houses. It is imperative that if those keep running in the long run, the extinction of animals will be no longer existed.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-05 | Nguyễn Thảo Phương | 89 | view |
| 2019-06-16 | tresna.soaduon | 73 | view |
| 2019-06-16 | tresna.soaduon | 56 | view |
| 2019-06-16 | aulaayubi | 73 | view |
| 2019-06-16 | fajarilyas | 61 | view |
- the quantity of Japanese who travel out of Japan from 1985 to 1990 and the market proportion of Japanese tourist traveling to Australia 67
- Foster Road 84
- The diagram provides information about the production of chocolate while a breakdown of the chocolate pricing proportion is presented in the bar graph. 73
- The different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one European city from 1960 to 2000 67
- Advertising is commonly found. What are the advantages and disadvantages of advertising? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 320, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
... number of people eating fish healthier as well as living longer. The more people ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, if, so, therefore, well, for example, in addition, such as, as well as, to sum up, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1905.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 362.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26243093923 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9011693635 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522099447514 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 603.0 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.225056922 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.263157895 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0526315789 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.68421052632 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188956199262 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0564823898427 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0639330128484 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110533444331 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0210060139499 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.