Transportation
The different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one European city from 1960 to 2000 are presented in the bar graph.
Overall, the proportion of train passengers increased steadily while a steady decrease was shown in the one of tube users, and both of them had fluctuation. The percentage of people travelling with car showed a significant rise while the percentage of those taking bus decreased dramatically. Again, the percentage of commuters choosing bus was the lowest rather than that of train, car, and tube.
The figures for the commuters traveling with train rose steadily from virtually 20 to around 27 percent between 1960 and 1980, a rise of about 7 percent in a 20-year period. The proportion of people driving car also increased dramatically by more or less 20. However, a steady decrease was experienced in the one taking tube to just above 20. The figures for the bus users showed a significant decline, decreasing to around 25.
By 2000, the percentage of train passengers had continued to decline steadily to approximately 22 while the one of people choosing tube had inclined slightly to 25 percent. After a long period, a significant incline had been shown in the figures for those choosing car to just under 40 while the proportion of commuters taking a bus has shown around a threefold decrease and reached by far the least popular transportation mode in one European city.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-19 | Chen ni | 84 | view |
| 2023-05-10 | mary.ssherr | 78 | view |
| 2023-03-02 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-02 | nkajune | view | |
| 2023-03-02 | nkajune | view |
- Foster Road 84
- The different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one European city from 1960 to 2000 67
- schools have several problems with students’ behaviour 78
- Transportation 67
- the quantity of Japanese who travel out of Japan from 1985 to 1990 and the market proportion of Japanese tourist traveling to Australia 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 338, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to bus'
Suggestion: to bus
...n, the percentage of commuters choosing bus was the lowest rather than that of trai...
^^^
Line 7, column 109, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'one' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'ones'.
Suggestion: ones
... steadily to approximately 22 while the one of people choosing tube had inclined sl...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, while, more or less
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1186.0 965.302439024 123% => OK
No of words: 240.0 196.424390244 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94166666667 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83485253389 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491666666667 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 363.6 283.868780488 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 11.0 4.33902439024 254% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.3308086219 43.030603864 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.6 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.2 5.23603664747 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0690244097652 0.215688989381 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0289459054456 0.103423049105 28% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.058989100971 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0638489220531 0.15604864568 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0705241114062 0.0819641961636 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.