The pie chart below shows the amount of money that a children's charity located in the USA spent and received in one year
The pie charts provide information on how a children's charity in USA collect and allocate their revenue in one year.
Overall, donated food is the major fundraising source for the charitable works of this organization whereas they spent most of the money on different program services.
According to the illustration, the philanthropy foundation earned exactly $53,561,580 and used up $53,224,896, which states that their annual saving is approximately 340,000.
In detail, a large amount of the revenue for the charity came as donated food which was more than 86% of the total earning. The community contributions only made up one tenth of the trust and the remaining 3% were shared between program revenue, investment income, government grants and other income.
On the contrary, they dispensed more than 95% of their fund on various program services and just left the remaining 2.6% and 1.6% on fundraising, along with management and general respectively.
- Many countries have compulsory military service for men after they leave school It would be a good idea to adopt this system for men and possibly women To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- The first car appeared on British roads in 1888. By the year 2000, there may be as many as 29 million vehicles on the British roads. Alternative forms of transport should be encouraged and international laws introduced to control car ownership and use. 78
- Many countries have compulsory military service for men after they leave school It would be a good idea to adopt this system for men and possibly women To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- Some education systems make students focus on certain subjects at the age of 15 while others require students to study a wide range of subjects until they leave school What are the benefits of each system Which do you think is a better educational system 92
- Environmental protection is the responsibility of politicians not individuals as individuals can do too little To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, whereas, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 808.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 151.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35099337748 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.50545371207 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90875522861 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.682119205298 0.547539520022 125% => OK
syllable_count: 238.5 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.1706111636 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.666666667 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1666666667 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 5.23603664747 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162377574375 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0805682562261 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111043807671 0.0843802449381 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0906584974943 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.119007928962 0.0819641961636 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.2329268293 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 11.4140731707 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.