With the development of online, there is no future for the radio.
To what extent do you agree?
There is an issue about the prospects of radio. Some Internet followers claim that radio will vanish lately owing to the popularity of the web. This essay disagrees with their viewpoint.
Let us start with reasons why some internet supporters state radio will disappear in the future due to the cyber. The first reason is that people can read the news and listen to music on the Internet. Citizens can find either any news or piece of music on the web, so it is unnecessary for them to turn on radio and to wait for news time between music breaks. Another reason is that radio stations also broadcast their programs digitally online. People do not have to abandon their favorite radio channels, because they can listen to them online. Furthermore, radio signals are unavailable in remote areas. Radio listeners commonly cannot enjoy radio in the countryside, since radio signals weaken through both hills as well as mountains, but with the help of the satellite connection, they are always connected to the web.
However, some radio followers believe that radio will remain for a long time. They justify their opinion with the following arguments. Firstly, radio is both free and widespread. In contrast to the web, radio listeners do not have to pay for the Internet to listen to the radio, because radio receivers, which are present in nearly every modern device, can accept pervasive radio waves. Secondly, radio programs usually comet live. Most humans usually find radio more interesting to listen to, since it casts the news as well as different entertaining programs in real time. Moreover, radio is relevant to a particular region. On the Internet, it is difficult for news seekers to find information about their region, but radio channels can supply them with it, since they normally focus on events in their hometown.
In conclusion, although some online promoters argue that the cyberspace can cause the death of radio, I think that radio will stay unaffected by the net, as long as it is free and amusing.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-20 | vmanpreet@outlook.com | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | Sheetal Bataniya | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-16 | Srbkor19sandhu | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-14 | Humayan Kabir | 89 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | Alishba | 61 | view |
- Large businesses have big budgets for marketing and promotion and as a result, people gravitate towards buying their products.What problems does it cause?What could be done to encourage people to buy local products? 78
- Some people think the best way to solve global environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel.To what extent do you agree? 11
- In some countries, most people prefer to rent their homes rather than buying them.What are the advantages and disadvantages of renting a home? 78
- You have a full-time job and you are also doing a part-time evening course. You now find that you cannot continue the course.Write a letter to your teachers. In your letter:describe the situationexplain why you cannot continue at this timesay what action 73
- Planting trees is very important for the environment. Some people says trees should be planted in the vacant areas of cities and towns, while other says housing facilities should be built instead.Discuss both views and give your opinion. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 718, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...radio signals weaken through both hills as well as mountains, but with the help of the sat...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, i think, in conclusion, in contrast, as well as, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1694.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98235294118 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47832123111 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523529411765 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 527.4 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 58.3752784164 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.1578947368 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8947368421 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.10526315789 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233181751808 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0817661038323 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0365525155756 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140337745543 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.062153561457 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.