The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
These two pie charts illustrate the proportion of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English between 2000 and 2010.
Overall, spanish is the most well-known language throughout the period, while students interesting in another language increased over the period.
In 2000, 30% of pupils in Britain were able to speak spanish; meanwhile, the percentages of students who were capable of using french and another language were equal, only 15%. There were 10% of students learned German and 20% of pupils did not interest in other languages.
After a decade, spanish is still one of the domination languages in this university. Moreover, the figure rose slightly to about 5%, up to 35%. At that time, compared to 2000, french users and no other language decreased marginally 5%, accounting for 10% for each. The ratio of Germany stayed at the same level over time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-09 | ppatel | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | Duong Linh | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-24 | nguyentuananh76 | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-17 | Jesslynindah | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-01 | Gre user | 78 | view |
- People have little understanding of the importance of the natural world What are the reasons for this and how can people learn more about the natural world 87
- The chart shows the percentage of males and females who were overweight in Australia from 1980 to 2010 77
- Some people think individuals cannot do anything to make the environment different, others think they can. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 84
- The maps below show the center of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Some businesses find that new employees finishing education lack basic interpersonal ability such as working with others as a part of a team. What do you think are the causes of this problem? How to solve this problem? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 182, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ition to English between 2000 and 2010. Overall, spanish is the most well-known ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
moreover, still, well, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 782.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 153.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11111111111 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51700396316 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60069950533 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.62091503268 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 233.1 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.9889592729 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.75 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.125 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.125 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.365275344231 0.215688989381 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14076233978 0.103423049105 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.165919196399 0.0843802449381 197% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234531338596 0.15604864568 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.191504705427 0.0819641961636 234% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.