Tell what the lecturer feels about the passage.
The reading and passage are both about willingness of employees working four times a week for a less pay rather than working for five days a week. The author of the reading suggests that this policy would benefit the company and help them earn profits. The lecturer challenges this claim and believes that this will not help the workers in improvement of their lives or company profits in any way.
First of all, the author of the reading believes that the employees working four times a week will get rest and will be much more alert thus producing lesser errors. He claims that there will be no change in additional company costs in hiring new employees since the exiting worker's cost is cut down by three fourth. This specific argument is challenged by the lecturer who thinks that hiring new people in the company will be an expensive since they have to be provided with initial training and medical costs of every individual has to be covered He claims that more office space and computers will also be required which will cut down on the profits that are essentially raised.
Secondly, the author suggests that there'll be a drop in unemployment rate since working fewer hours will shift the existing work to other people. The lecturer however rebuts this by mentioning that hiring is an expensive procedure. He elaborates this point by saying that the employees will be asked to work extra time since there will be an increased expectations and as a result, the current jobs might become unpleasant.
Finally, the author mentions that this policy can help improve the overall quality of life since the employees will be able to find extra time to spend on their hobbies, family and friends. In contrast, the lecturer is of the position that this will lead to decrease in job stability during economic crisis since they are working only four days a week. And employees who work more will be able to have a much secure job.
In conclusion, lecturer effectively casts doubt on all of the claims made by the author in the passage.
- When schools do not have enough funding or teachers, some people think physical education classes should be cut, while others believe that courses in art and music should be eliminated first. Which do you think is preferable, and why 88
- It has been said, “Not everything that is learned is contained in books.” Compare andcontrast knowledge gained from experience with knowledge gained from books. In youropinion, which source is more important? Why? 78
- Nowadays, food has become easier to prepare. Has this change improved the waypeople live? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- Tell what the lecturer feels about the passage. 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 254, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...the company and help them earn profits. The lecturer challenges this claim and beli...
^^^
Line 3, column 310, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'fourth' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'fourths'.
Suggestion: fourths
...iting workers cost is cut down by three fourth. This specific argument is challenged b...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 52, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...on, lecturer effectively casts doubt on all of the claims made by the author in the passag...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, as to, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.4613686534 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 5.04856512141 317% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 30.3222958057 152% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1695.0 1373.03311258 123% => OK
No of words: 354.0 270.72406181 131% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78813559322 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38847612915 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 145.348785872 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.485875706215 0.540411800872 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 515.7 419.366225166 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 21.2450331126 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.4146636154 49.2860985944 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.384615385 110.228320801 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2307692308 21.698381199 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8461538462 7.06452816374 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0567909959439 0.272083759551 21% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0304703416502 0.0996497079465 31% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0428108088124 0.0662205650399 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0546526957751 0.162205337803 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0498594490229 0.0443174109184 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.3589403974 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 53.8541721854 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 11.0289183223 114% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 12.2367328918 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.498013245 122% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.