The graph below shows information about the recruitment of teachers in Ontario between 2001 and 2007. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph depicts the proportion of the recruited teachers in Ontario during the period of 7 years starting from 2001 to 2007 in the two language teaching domains: english and french
At the first glance, it is obvious from the line chart that there is a dramatic disparity between the two groups of lecturers. The number of love language teachers took over the statistic whereas english one indicated a significant downward trend.
In terms of french, the amount of admitted application illustrates a gradual increase. although in 2001s the digit of french lecturers was a bit smaller than english, it suffered from a sudden fall in 2002s, plummeted and lately far outweighed the distance with English at the end of the period, at around 75%.
In contrast, english teaching express the considerably reduction which is depicted by the constant decreasement, a serious fluctuation. Apparently, it has always stood at the bottom of the list in these 7 years with nearly 28% at the final time frame.
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 11
- Nowadays, more and more people decide to have children later in their life. What are the reasons? What are the effects on society and family life? 61
- The percentage of overweight children in western society has increased by almost 20% in the last 10 years.Discuss the causes and effects of this disturbing trend 67
- If countries are serious about solving traffic problems they should tax private cars very heavily and use the money to provide free or very cheap rail travel 69
- The graph below shows information about the recruitment of teachers in Ontario between 2001 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 55
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 183, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...age teaching domains: english and french At the first glance, it is obvious from ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 164, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rs. The number of love language teachers took over the statistic whereas english ...
^^
Line 5, column 88, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Although
...ication illustrates a gradual increase. although in 2001s the digit of french lecturers ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, first, if, whereas, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 840.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06024096386 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78547859185 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.638554216867 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 237.6 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 78.3618742332 43.030603864 182% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.0 112.824112599 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.6666666667 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 5.23603664747 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0698398554354 0.215688989381 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.028258451556 0.103423049105 27% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0513097922596 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0529385997303 0.15604864568 34% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0694460777756 0.0819641961636 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.