TPO 39 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Without a shadow of the doubt, having a good job plays a vital role in our success. By obtaining a good career and being a expert person in it we can gaurantee our future. Some people contend that in the past it was easier to indentify what type of career or job would lead to a secure future, while others assert it is not true. Both of the opposing arguments appear to be somewhat convincing and stand to point. However, my personal experience and actual observation of life have led me to agree that in the past identifying a good job was easier compared to present time. In the ensuing lines, I delve into my reasons to substantiate my point.
The first and possibly the paramount reason is that in the past communities and countries were not so complex. So, there were few number of jobs with determined duties. So, people easily chose a suitable profession for themselves based on their skills and abilities. If someone was not satisfied with her/his job, she/ he could change hee/his career. For example, my garndfather was a farmer at first, but he could not obtain success in farming. So, he decided to be a teacher. That was a good desicion for him because he really liked kids. As you can see, in the past there were few choices and people can easily chose the best job for themselves.
Another point springing to mind is that in the past there were not many expert people to occupy jobs. Furthermore, because the competition between people was little in comparision with present time, they could obtain knowledge about the profession they wanted. As a result, being an expert by defult lead to having a well-paid job. Having a good job not only ensures a good life but also increases people's confidence. General speaking, I really believe that finding a uitable career in the past was a simple action.
Admittedly, there are some justidfications by one who argues that currently identifying a good job is esier compered to the past. Today, people can use the internet to find their favorite jobs just in a few second. However, I afirm that identifying proper jobs in the past was very easy. Although there are some profits in identifying jobs today, they can be neglected compared to the past.
To sum it all up, it is easy to see the advantages of identifying a suitable job would lead to a successful future. In the past, the life was not complex and there were many jobs to do. Also, competition between people to jub hanting was little and people can easily occupy their favorite jobs. I hope someday all the people in the world can do their dreamy jobs. I really believe that if governments do their jobs properly and build many companies and institutes, people will have their favorite jobs.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-17 | nusybah | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-01 | naziii | 76 | view |
| 2019-12-31 | Abbas.ghaffari | 76 | view |
| 2019-12-04 | raniamekhaiel | 70 | view |
| 2019-11-15 | catherine0915 | 76 | view |
- TOEFL T P O 19 Integrated Writing Task 7
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cell phone, online games, and social networking Web site.Use specific reasons and examples t 73
- For the successful development of a country, it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children (five to ten years old) than to spend money on universities. 60
- Essay topics:Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?-Interrupt and correct the mistake right away-Wait until the class or 70
- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 122, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...s. By obtaining a good career and being a expert person in it we can gaurantee ou...
^
Line 2, column 126, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun number seems to be countable; consider using: 'few numbers'.
Suggestion: few numbers
...ies were not so complex. So, there were few number of jobs with determined duties. So, peo...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 466, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...speaking, I really believe that finding a uitable career in the past was a simple...
^
Line 4, column 203, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun second seems to be countable; consider using: 'few seconds'.
Suggestion: few seconds
...t to find their favorite jobs just in a few second. However, I afirm that identifying prop...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, really, second, so, well, while, for example, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 15.1003584229 179% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2234.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 480.0 407.700716846 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65416666667 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68069463864 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5637395376 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.46875 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 707.4 618.680645161 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.6003584229 136% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.7898571956 48.9658058833 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.7857142857 100.406767564 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1428571429 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.60714285714 5.45110844103 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24348562984 0.236089414692 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0721651007754 0.076458572812 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.061608586603 0.0737576698707 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146028474648 0.150856017488 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0432921274277 0.0645574589148 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 11.7677419355 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.39 10.9000537634 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.