The government should allocate more funds to teaching science rather than other subjects for a country to develop and progress. To what extent do you agree?
Studying science has always been the valued and essential part of the society. It is argued that the state must provide wealth to teaching science more than other subjects for a nation to grow and improve. I completely agree, because without the help of science subject humans cannot develop and other subjects also require science.
Science and technology are vital for the progress of any nation without scientist or doctors’ people cannot find solutions to deadly diseases to save the humankind. Hence the government should reserve extra money for teaching science in schools as compare with other subjects. In the last decade, the disease named AIDS had tremendous life loss in the society with the spread of HIV infection, therefore the scientist worked hard with quick results to find out the ways to protect people from such infections with certain precautionary measures.
In addition to this, science is the subject, which is linked with other subjects, in other words, other subjects are incomplete without science. Thus, state must give top priority to science in terms of budgeting. For instance, geographical study of earth always need science to find the probable reason of such conditions of a particular land, possibility of cultivation in desert land or making the land suitable for agricultural purposes. Therefore, it is necessary that government should distribute more wealth for science as compare with other subjects, so that more and more students can study science.
In conclusion, studying science is necessity in this world to upgrade and develop in various fields, therefore I believe that, the government should a lot more money on science subjects as compare with others.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-07-02 | bhatvishal@ | 67 | view |
2019-07-02 | bhatvishal@ | 61 | view |
2019-06-24 | bhatvishal@ | 56 | view |
- Nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish. Why do you think this is happening? What can the government do to reduce the amount of rubbish produced? Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 61
- The prevention of health problems and illness is more important than treatment and medicine. Government funding should reflect this. To what extent do you agree? 61
- Nowadays, there is a trend that reports of media focus on problems and emergencies rather than positive developments. Some people think it is harmful to individuals and to society. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 73
- Some people argue that technological inventions, such as mobile phones, are making people socially less interactive. Do you agree or disagree? 73
- Some people think that employers should not care about the way their employees dress, because what matters is the quality of their work. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 170, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
... deadly diseases to save the humankind. Hence the government should reserve extra mon...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, therefore, thus, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1439.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29044117647 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66821356833 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544117647059 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.0897901992 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.818181818 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7272727273 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305875473475 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132101690786 0.084324248473 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.084709223656 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201675829672 0.151304729494 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0528236075223 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.