Some students prefer classes with frequent discussions between the professor and the students with almost no lectures. Other students prefer classes with many lectures and almost no discussions. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It is critically important for students having decent backgrounds on both their academic field and social life. In my opinion, learning through a discussion about their learned things far better than just listening to lectures from their professor. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, Having a lot of debates and discussions will develop our great deal of skills such as communication, having a debate, exchange your ideas, listening to your partners which give you valuable abilities to become superior to your peers. I have to admit that my opinion on this matter has been profoundly influenced by my experience. Two years ago, In my history class my professor conducted a dispute about our notion of the history, this occurrence made me realise that until that time I have never listened to my peers’ contemplation and deliver my voice to the public about this concept. It was completely made me a more open-minded person than before. Since that time I have enrolled in debate class and did many volunteer jobs to conduct a conversation among the ordinary public about their opinion of the government policy and taxes. As a result, I found out what I wanted to do in my rest of life so I decided to become a lector.
Secondly, It creates a great bond between the professor and students, thus it utterly affects academic excellence and gives you an opportunity to work in internship programs which are very helpful to find a job after graduation. Drawing from my brother’s experience, he didn’t the best student in his high school because he is so modest and reluctant to cooperate with his classmates. However, after he attended university he completely changed a lot due to the great amount of presentation and deliberations, as a result, he strengthened his relationship between his main subject’s professor and him. His professor gave him a lot of chances such as working on the projects, attend seminars and conferences. As far as I concerned, It greatly helped him after university and then he promoted quickly. Now he successfully works within a highly prestigious and well-paid company.
In light of the above-mentioned reasons, I strongly believe that attending a class which has a lot of conversations is better than later one. This is because it enables to become an independent person who has a lot of worthwhile abilities and because it fortifies the bond which will aid to gain a job between dexterous influential professor and students.
- Do you agree or disagree computer games is waste of time and children should not be allowed to play 76
- Teachers should be paid at least as much as doctors, lawyers and business leaders. 86
- Some people prefer to live in a small town. Others prefer to live in a big city. Which place would you prefer to live in? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 70
- In many organizations, perhaps the best way to approach certain new projectsis to assemble a group of people into a team. Having a team of people attacka project offers several advantages. First of all, a group of people has a widerrange of knowledge, exp 85
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? A zoo has no useful purpose. Use specific reasons and examples to explain your answer. 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, secondly, so, then, thus, well, while, i feel, such as, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 64.0 43.0788530466 149% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2115.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 422.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01184834123 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53239876712 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04896014944 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545023696682 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 667.8 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.1308674983 48.9658058833 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.411764706 100.406767564 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8235294118 20.6045352989 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.94117647059 5.45110844103 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113471994277 0.236089414692 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0333469245156 0.076458572812 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0252880471177 0.0737576698707 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0666953168749 0.150856017488 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00256407180773 0.0645574589148 4% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 11.7677419355 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 86.8835125448 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.