Some people think that a person improves their intellectual skill more when doing group activities. To what extent do you agree?
There is a controversial issue about the effects team work causes on individuals. Some managers state that it can boosts thinking abilities. In this essay, I agree with their point of view.
Let us start with the reasons why some supervisors claim that team involvement boosts the potential of mind. The first justification is that people in groups tend to exchange thoughts. Working in groups usually involves communication between members, which helps them easier overcome any challenges than they would do alone. Another cause is that in groups people normally develop social skills. Inexperienced persons, such as graduates, generally learn quickly how to address people of different ages, because they need to interact with others in the company, if they want to succeed in life. Furthermore, in groups youngsters also may find the answer to disturbing questions. There are many questions, that young people are struggling at, since their relatives can resolve, but with the help of other people, they can eventually handle them.
However, some teachers argue that team work has no positive impact on cognitive abilities. They justify their viewpoint with the following arguments. Firstly, people in groups tend to concentrate solely on few features in the project. Company personnel, for example, cannot replace each other, because they are unaware what their colleagues are working on, but people, who mostly work on their own, can do it, since they have a broader horizon. Secondly, study in groups may hinder mental development. Talented students, for instance, often suffer from constant delays, if they get education in class, so, to learn more effectively, they mainly study individually with teachers. Moreover, introvert people feel uncomfortable in groups. Many people cannot focus on education due to their psychological features, if they are surrounded by other people, so they show best results in isolation.
In conclusion, even though some tutors believe that team involvement causes problems to some people, I think that, in most cases, it stimulates thinking skills.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-19 | kongkona | 67 | view |
| 2019-10-19 | Navkiran kaur | 67 | view |
| 2019-10-03 | CANADA | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-23 | Mohammad Rezaur Rahman | 67 | view |
| 2019-07-17 | Sonali Guha | 67 | view |
- Every country should have a free health service, even if this means that the latest medical treatments may not be available through the service because they are too expensive.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- The best way to improve health is to exercise daily.To what extent do you agree? 11
- Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information, such as their hobbies and interests, and whether they are married or single. Some people say that this information may be relevant and useful. Other disagree. Discuss both these vi 84
- with an increasing population communicating via the internet and text messaging, face to face communication will become a thing of the past. to what extent do you agree? 95
- More and more newspapers and news channels are using photographs to support their news articles and stories Some people think photographs are not a reliable source of news while others consider photographs to be irrefutable Discuss both sides and give you 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 115, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'boost'
Suggestion: boost
...iduals. Some managers state that it can boosts thinking abilities. In this essay, I ag...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 535, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...opment. Talented students, for instance, often suffer from constant delays, if th...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, such as, in most cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1772.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43558282209 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76378836054 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628834355828 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 2.10420841683 380% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.6539733611 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.2631578947 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1578947368 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.57894736842 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194046277041 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0603063315184 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0314186173047 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119724720689 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0134314293673 0.056905535591 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.